▲ 220 ▼ Why my apps will soon be gone from the Google Play Store (frozenfractal.com) submitted 2 years ago by moonleay@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments Disclaimer: Even though the title says "my", this is not my blogpost.
[+] Dkarma@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (8 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -7 points 2 years ago (7 children) No shit? Which is why requiring a number isn't OK. But the minute you make a phone number available to customers, it cannot be acceptable not to treat it like a phone number. iPhone already has a lot of apps that aren't worth the effort to make available for Android, and this is going to make that meaningfully worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (6 children) How about you post your phone number here? It seems you have no problem in sharing someone share their number in public, and I hope you put the same srandard to yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (5 children) You should really work on your reading comprehension. I have repeatedly made it clear that the requirement is not OK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) So what exactly is wrong with making the voice mail say "I will never check this. Email me at person@company.tld if you want help"? If the requirement is bullshit, why shouldn't people comply maliciously? As long as there's some way to contact the dev (like through email), who gives a rats ass if the phone number doesn't work? I don't need to call Lawrence Dawson cause Sync is having issues. I can post on the sub or probably find an email somewhere. It's not gonna be instant like a phone call, but it doesn't need to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because it's lying to your customer to have a phone number you don't use listed. Listing a number is an advertisement that you offer phone support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago I legit can't tell if this person is a really good troll or if they're talking in circles and haven't figured that out yet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay, I missed read and I apologize. However, you're just trolling. You disagree the phone requirement. Yet when others propose alternative solutions that direct uses to an equally direct communication method, you oppose that too without providing any alternatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago The alternative is to not list a phone number and to abandon Google until they remove the requirement. Listing a phone number you won't answer is lying to your customers. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -7 points 2 years ago (7 children) No shit? Which is why requiring a number isn't OK. But the minute you make a phone number available to customers, it cannot be acceptable not to treat it like a phone number. iPhone already has a lot of apps that aren't worth the effort to make available for Android, and this is going to make that meaningfully worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (6 children) How about you post your phone number here? It seems you have no problem in sharing someone share their number in public, and I hope you put the same srandard to yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (5 children) You should really work on your reading comprehension. I have repeatedly made it clear that the requirement is not OK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) So what exactly is wrong with making the voice mail say "I will never check this. Email me at person@company.tld if you want help"? If the requirement is bullshit, why shouldn't people comply maliciously? As long as there's some way to contact the dev (like through email), who gives a rats ass if the phone number doesn't work? I don't need to call Lawrence Dawson cause Sync is having issues. I can post on the sub or probably find an email somewhere. It's not gonna be instant like a phone call, but it doesn't need to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because it's lying to your customer to have a phone number you don't use listed. Listing a number is an advertisement that you offer phone support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago I legit can't tell if this person is a really good troll or if they're talking in circles and haven't figured that out yet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay, I missed read and I apologize. However, you're just trolling. You disagree the phone requirement. Yet when others propose alternative solutions that direct uses to an equally direct communication method, you oppose that too without providing any alternatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago The alternative is to not list a phone number and to abandon Google until they remove the requirement. Listing a phone number you won't answer is lying to your customers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (6 children) How about you post your phone number here? It seems you have no problem in sharing someone share their number in public, and I hope you put the same srandard to yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (5 children) You should really work on your reading comprehension. I have repeatedly made it clear that the requirement is not OK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) So what exactly is wrong with making the voice mail say "I will never check this. Email me at person@company.tld if you want help"? If the requirement is bullshit, why shouldn't people comply maliciously? As long as there's some way to contact the dev (like through email), who gives a rats ass if the phone number doesn't work? I don't need to call Lawrence Dawson cause Sync is having issues. I can post on the sub or probably find an email somewhere. It's not gonna be instant like a phone call, but it doesn't need to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because it's lying to your customer to have a phone number you don't use listed. Listing a number is an advertisement that you offer phone support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago I legit can't tell if this person is a really good troll or if they're talking in circles and haven't figured that out yet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay, I missed read and I apologize. However, you're just trolling. You disagree the phone requirement. Yet when others propose alternative solutions that direct uses to an equally direct communication method, you oppose that too without providing any alternatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago The alternative is to not list a phone number and to abandon Google until they remove the requirement. Listing a phone number you won't answer is lying to your customers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (5 children) You should really work on your reading comprehension. I have repeatedly made it clear that the requirement is not OK. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) So what exactly is wrong with making the voice mail say "I will never check this. Email me at person@company.tld if you want help"? If the requirement is bullshit, why shouldn't people comply maliciously? As long as there's some way to contact the dev (like through email), who gives a rats ass if the phone number doesn't work? I don't need to call Lawrence Dawson cause Sync is having issues. I can post on the sub or probably find an email somewhere. It's not gonna be instant like a phone call, but it doesn't need to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because it's lying to your customer to have a phone number you don't use listed. Listing a number is an advertisement that you offer phone support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago I legit can't tell if this person is a really good troll or if they're talking in circles and haven't figured that out yet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay, I missed read and I apologize. However, you're just trolling. You disagree the phone requirement. Yet when others propose alternative solutions that direct uses to an equally direct communication method, you oppose that too without providing any alternatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago The alternative is to not list a phone number and to abandon Google until they remove the requirement. Listing a phone number you won't answer is lying to your customers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) So what exactly is wrong with making the voice mail say "I will never check this. Email me at person@company.tld if you want help"? If the requirement is bullshit, why shouldn't people comply maliciously? As long as there's some way to contact the dev (like through email), who gives a rats ass if the phone number doesn't work? I don't need to call Lawrence Dawson cause Sync is having issues. I can post on the sub or probably find an email somewhere. It's not gonna be instant like a phone call, but it doesn't need to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because it's lying to your customer to have a phone number you don't use listed. Listing a number is an advertisement that you offer phone support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago I legit can't tell if this person is a really good troll or if they're talking in circles and haven't figured that out yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because it's lying to your customer to have a phone number you don't use listed. Listing a number is an advertisement that you offer phone support. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago I legit can't tell if this person is a really good troll or if they're talking in circles and haven't figured that out yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago I legit can't tell if this person is a really good troll or if they're talking in circles and haven't figured that out yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Okay, I missed read and I apologize. However, you're just trolling. You disagree the phone requirement. Yet when others propose alternative solutions that direct uses to an equally direct communication method, you oppose that too without providing any alternatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago The alternative is to not list a phone number and to abandon Google until they remove the requirement. Listing a phone number you won't answer is lying to your customers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago The alternative is to not list a phone number and to abandon Google until they remove the requirement. Listing a phone number you won't answer is lying to your customers. permalink fedilink source parent