149
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Are you trying to turn this into "So, they got exactly what they wanted! Signal cooperated and are thus not secure!"?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That is not what I'm trying, no. Sorry if it came across like that.
My point is, that this isn't an effective proof of a zero knowledge approach. In their blogpost, Signal says they don't store anything, but this specific instance of a search warrant doesn't serve to prove that.
It is great of them that they publish when and what they are asked to disclose, that practice is definitly appreciated. I do trust Signal, it is my main messenger.
This is just not the stresstest @[email protected] makes it out to be in the top comment, imo.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the additonal link. It's interesting that Signal didn't provide the last time the user connected to Signal here, as that was information which was requested and information that they have...

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
149 points (100.0% liked)

The Signal messenger and protocol.

2245 readers
1 users here now

https://signal.org/

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS