523
Doctors Remove Woman’s Brain Implant Against Her Will (futurism.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A woman whose epilepsy was greatly improved by an experimental brain implant was devastated when, just two years after getting it, she was forced to have it removed due to the company that made it going bankrupt.

As the MIT Technology Review reports, an Australian woman named Rita Leggett who received an experimental seizure-tracking brain-computer interface (BCI) implant from the now-defunct company Neuravista in 2010 has become a stark example not only of the ways neurotech can help people, but also of the trauma of losing access to them when experiments end or companies go under.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 93 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I feel like maybe research on medical implants like this should be done by the state.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 69 points 2 years ago

    At least, when the company goes defunct, they should be forced to sell it to a company that's required to maintain the upkeep for products using the IP they bought or the government should eminent domain

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    So should a lot of research, for public benefit. Medical absolutely, space absolutely.

    The problem with that model is no one acquires immoral levels of wealth, which means those that set policy don't get as large of bribes.

    And as a species, our actions have spoken on no uncertain terms, we'd literally rather destroy our only habitat and ourselves then let go of the dream of living like modern Pharoahs on the backs of others.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] -16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What could possibly go wrong with your idea

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    It got us to the moon.

    Then we decided to sell off our society for private profit under the lie that we'd all benefit.

    Biggest reason this country has gotten this cartoonishly shitty, why our commons like bridges are literally collapsing.

    Public research was slower and more considered, as it didn't have the very unscientific sole goal of "how do we monetize this half-baked discovery NOW?!" with no other consideration let alone to societal consequences, but publically funded research yielded social benefits we all reaped through the commons. Reckless growth/metastasis for private profit is giving us technologies that make us miserable and that only truly benefit private shareholders at our expense. Plus you know, the whole reverse terraforming our only world against us, again for short term private profit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    OK, good point. Research yes. Somebody still needs to control and manage the things. That concerns me. I'm not imagining a medical /brain implant version of nasa. My problem is when politicians start imposing politics to the situation. I don't want the governments or private companies dicking around in my brain imposing fad or outrage of the day changes. Standards good, control, not so good.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent