Is there really a reason, for example, for there to be the distinction of "magazine" and "community"? When you're federating, the same features should be called the same, if close enough. That way everyone can talk with everyone about stuff and we all immediately understand each other.

Would also alleviate confusion for any new adopters.

^I'm pretty sure this is going to be impossible though, since each sides egos will likely get in the way :D^

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

I think there's a case to be made that some common nomenclature should be applied to activitypub implementations. For the same reason everyone can agree that an email has a "CC" line. Even though nobody knows what "carbon copying" is anymore. It's just a standard term so everyone is speaking the same language.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    I think there's a case to be made that some common nomenclature should be applied to activitypub implementations

    But there's no standard when platforms on activitypub are so vastly different

    peertube are is the equivalent of or youtube
    lemmy is almost like reddit
    Mastodon is twitter-like
    Kbin is a mix between twitter and reddit
    friendica is facebook
    etc.

    I think is ok for every platform being different, left the autors express however they want. Maybe if you are a boomer who never touched a computer or a smarthphone ever these things may be confusing, but for digital natives? really? Can't you catch this stuff on the fly? It must be true what they say, the younger the dumber, to the point kids today don't know the difference between a file and a folder

  • source
  • parent