▲ 404 ▼ Musk's X sues advertisers over alleged 'massive advertiser boycott'. (www.voanews.com) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world 68 comments fedilink hide all child comments Archive.
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) This requires proof for collusion, does it not? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vanth@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago I would think. And if that proof exists, it will come up at the appropriate time during legal proceedings. I'm skeptical there is any. I guess they could call the entire existence of GARM to be collusion; companies banding together to "punish" companies who don't follow their guidelines. But X is (was?) a voluntary member of GARM, so it seems that would be a difficult argument for them to make without implicating themselves too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago I would think. And if that proof exists, it will come up at the appropriate time during legal proceedings. I'm skeptical there is any. I guess they could call the entire existence of GARM to be collusion; companies banding together to "punish" companies who don't follow their guidelines. But X is (was?) a voluntary member of GARM, so it seems that would be a difficult argument for them to make without implicating themselves too. permalink fedilink source parent