▲ 404 ▼ Musk's X sues advertisers over alleged 'massive advertiser boycott'. (www.voanews.com) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world 68 comments fedilink hide all child comments Archive.
[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 child) He can sue, but he won't win in any sane court. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] solomon42069@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children) They'd never even hear it. To give this lawsuit any credibility, they'd have to effectively say that businesses spending/donating money is not free speech. Which would effectively be the opposite of Citizens United. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think they give a shit about consistency? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] solomon42069@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Maybe they’ll say billionaires can sue as long as it’s an official act. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] solomon42069@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children) They'd never even hear it. To give this lawsuit any credibility, they'd have to effectively say that businesses spending/donating money is not free speech. Which would effectively be the opposite of Citizens United. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think they give a shit about consistency? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] solomon42069@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Maybe they’ll say billionaires can sue as long as it’s an official act. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children) They'd never even hear it. To give this lawsuit any credibility, they'd have to effectively say that businesses spending/donating money is not free speech. Which would effectively be the opposite of Citizens United. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think they give a shit about consistency? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] solomon42069@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Maybe they’ll say billionaires can sue as long as it’s an official act. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) You think they give a shit about consistency? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] solomon42069@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] solomon42069@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago Maybe they’ll say billionaires can sue as long as it’s an official act. permalink fedilink source parent