you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Hitler came into power because the liberal PM appointed him chancellor to avoid creating a coalition with the left party. Liberals would rather work with a fascist over a socialist any day of the week.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That's a lie; Paul Von Hindenburg was an a outspoken Monarchist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    SPD has been a liberal center-left party since it's founding. Hindenburg's closely held political beliefs had no bearing on the outcome of a liberal party avoiding a coalition with socialists by appointing a fascist to chancellor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    SPD has been a liberal center-left

    That's a contradiction in terms: Liberalism is a right-wing philosophy; it can't be center-left. JFC you idiots are all the same. Sometimes I wonder if y'all're capable of having 2 consistent thoughts. Go on, tell me about how anyone who isn't an ML is a liberal (including Anarchists) and every Liberal is a fascist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Look, I don't get to control how people classify political parties. That is how SPD has always been defined. Centrist parties have always had a variety of status quo-esque ideologies. Hindenburg was a monarchist and a member of the SPD, because monarchy was the recently departed political system and he wanted a return to the status quo. Liberals were also a part of SPD, and there are a variety of samey progressive liberal ideologies that seek to entrench capitalism while providing social benefits to the people. That is how a liberal center-left party can exist.

    And for the record, I'm an anarcho-syndicalist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments