this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Run It Yourself

2923 readers
2 users here now

Overlaps somewhat with /c/floss_replacement and /c/privacy; crossposts welcome

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Obviously, the closer to AGPL, the better, in my opinion. But I'll run some MIT, if the product is sufficiently better, for my use case, than the alternative. For example, I want a multilibrary photo album. Photoprism (AGPL) doesn't offer it, but Immich (MIT) does. As soon as Photoprism has that functionality, I'll switch back simply for the license.

My hard line is open source. I don't use any proprietary solutions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Using? Pretty much all of my possible use cases are covered by open source software.

Writing for the community? GPLv3 for legal reasons.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@drwho @butter I am curious about the legal reasons. Can you elaborate?

I write server side software, so GPL is easy to go around for companies, therefore I use AGPL for all my software.