you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What I got was that there would be no Google or Mozilla specific code/libraries, but FOSS libraries for common media formats would be included so that the project can reach a wider audience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What I got was that there would be no Google or Mozilla specific code/libraries, but FOSS libraries for common media formats would be included so that the project can reach a wider audience.

    AFAIK They use Skia, the rendering library made by Google so this does not appear true either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Well that sucks. There are so many alternatives with just as much support

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I mean, to be fair, Skia appears to be good - Firefox and LibreOffice also use it for example. I believe GNOME Web will also use Skia in GNOME 47. It certainly seems that people are moving away from Cairo and into Skia. For what reason? I don't know.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Honestly, I'm not sure that's quite a good takeaway. The article itself was pretty much a bland nothing burger and the articles that were cited were, again, pretty bland. The biggest thing I can find is that they won't be facing off another browser and then it's like, well duh.

    It's just one of those things. It just feels like the original dude said one thing and the author interpreted it a completely different way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments