you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 81 points 2 years ago (56 children)

It's the one with a dev that thinks that replacing "he" by "they" is political propaganda?

Yeah, no thanks.

  • source
  • hideshow 59 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Can you provide some context?

    Edit: I found the context. Here and here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    maybe I'm not seeing where the smoking gun is, here. I see a guy saying something akin to "can we not do this here in the github please"

    and then I see a bunch of people blowing up and yelling about "dehumanization" over it.

    ...why is this such a huge deal exactly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Absolutely nothing. The fact that they had to bring up a totally irrelevant 3 year old issue during an event that is supposed to be celebrated tells you a lot. They have been blatantly brigading various communities just for attention, and probably to get the dev cancelled or something. Even this post, the privacy community does not need this whole chain of replies. And yet, they overshadow every legit discussion with this bullshit unprompted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    so I don't understand. why are all these comments yelling the same stuff? did they just decide to harass this one guy for saying "take it somewhere else, please"?

    I'm trying to find anything malicious in anything he's said. I'm finding nothing but a dude working on a browser.

    this kind of behavior scares me greatly. I know individuals who have been victims of real transphobia. this seems to be a simple language difference. and I think targeting this guy is a mistake.

    Flooding and being loud doesn't make them right. it just means they're loud.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I’m trying to find anything malicious in anything he’s said

    They use the "silence is violence" trope to harass and terrorize projects, hiding behind their "protected status" as a transgender. Whenever someone rejects anything that calls for "greater inclusion", they go nuclear and tell all their friends to do the same. The bullied becomes the bully. It's very childish. It's always people that never contribute any meaningful code as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Open mindedness is a key factor for success (especially in open source). Inclusivity demonstrates open mindedness. The fact that the lead dev goes out of his way to prevent such a minor change (it's not even like people demanded a strict CoC or something) is a bad signal

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    for someone who can speak a language that lacks gendered pronouns, this "hysteria" over he/she/they is ridiculous!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    As someone who speaks a language with gendered pronouns but no neutral option, this is very awkward to deal with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    yes, it's awkward for the "individual" who is longing for reliable expression

    it also seems to be awkward for people who can't figure out the changes in the language they think as their own. They are irritated by their "disfigured" reflection

    it's awkward for officials who need to make decisions (positive or negative) about the use of "inclusive" language

    we give shape to languages and languages shape us

    English could initially have neutral pronouns and people would be obliged to find other reasons to hate each other 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well on the contrary you should understand it more. A gendered pronoun carries an idea of gender, and having a genderless pronoun frees the sentence of this gender assumption. Nothing very hard to understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (53 replies)