276
Why we don't have 128-bit CPUs (www.xda-developers.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I actually added detail that wasn't already discussed in the article?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I actually didn’t know that about addressing before your comment and so I found it very interesting, thanks

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Some applications use those unused bits to add tags to pointers but it's important to mask those out before attempting to dereference the address. I'm not sure about ARM but x86-64 requires bits 49-63 to be copies of bit 48 (kinda like sign-extension), ironically to ensure that no one is using those bits to store extra data.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent