Privacy

51,440 readers

4,909 active

364 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 7 years ago

moderators

Decentralized Encrypted P2P Chat (chat.positive-intentions.com)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by positive_intentions@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Id like to introduce you to a decentralized chat app that works purely in the browser. Breaking away from traditional solutions that require registration and installation.

A decentralized infrastructure has many unique challenges and this is a unique approach. Ive taken previsous feedback and made updates. Its important to note, it is still a work-in-progress and provided for testing/review/feedback purposes. it would be great if you can tell me what you think.

Some of the features of the app include:

Free
Decentralised
No cookies
P2P encrypted
No registration
No installing
Group messaging
Text messaging
Multimedia messaging
Offline messaging (LAN/hotspot)
File transfer
Video calls
Data-ownership
Selfhosted (optional)
Screensharing (on desktop browsers)
OS notifications (where supported)

With no registration or installation required, its easy to get started.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kenkenken@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Oh no. I'm fine with installation. What with I'm not fine it's requirement to access some websites to load an app, dependence from DNS in inner links, inability to proxy it through overlay networks, protection from spamming the network. Lack of everything what could make it deserve to be named P2P app. I just don't want to see it placed in the same category with BitTorrent, I2P or RetroShare.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] positive_intentions@lemmy.ml [S] 3 points 2 years ago

if "trust" in the static files from a url is a concern, (which is very reasonable), you can easily host your own instance.

i think it fits squarely as a "P2P app". over a hotspot, you can practically send messages offline. im not sure what other qualifiers are needed.

i dont think its ready to be compared to other tools yet. but i would be aiming to make it comparable to something like signal... but it'll take a while to get there.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent