116
Nice tat, who’s that? (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/ukraine_war_news@lemmygrad.ml
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 54 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Get real. Just because somebody has a tattoo of a 20th century German imperialist on his arm doesn’t mean that he’s neofascist. It’s obvious that he got that tattoo to show his support for Britain. Look:

Churchill said of Adolf Hitler’s book Mein Kampf that ‘the story of that struggle cannot be read without admiration [for the courage, the perseverance, and the vital force which enabled him to challenge, defy conciliate or overcome, all the authority of resistances which barred his path]’. […] “I have always said that if Britain were defeated in a war I hoped [that] we should find a Hitler to lead us back to our rightful position among nations.”

The Anglo‐German Naval Agreement was signed; it allowed the [Third Reich] to construct a fleet that would [be] 35% of the Royal Navy’s tonnage in surface ships and [be] 45% of Britain’s submarine tonnage with a provision for parity if Germany believed it necessary for her security requirements. German rearmament had been officially sanctioned and the Treaty of Versailles officially but unilaterally revised.

Britain was willing to ignore a blatant violation of the Treaty of Versailles. In the twelve months that followed the Anschluss, British merchants sent 134,000 tons of scrap iron and steel to the Reich, a quantity nearly three times larger than in the preceding year (Stanley, 1939).

So quit posting Muscovite propaganda.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •