Technology

59581 readers

3020 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1172

Scarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway. (boingboing.net)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

186 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There isn’t any evidence that they used her voice

There's ample evidence, via the samples OpenAI released during their demo.

Actually, there is evidence that they paid a voice actress to model that specific actress’s voice.

Actually, there's not. OpenAI refuses to release where they got their voice samples. They insist it came from "another unnamed actress".

She’s not the only person with those vocal qualities.

If the raw data OpenAI used to train its AI came from voice samples produced by Scarlett Johansson, then there actually IS only one person with those vocal qualities.

If I wanted James Earl Jones to read my eulogy, but he isn’t available or is unwilling. Why couldn’t I get someone to sound like him to read it?

Nothing is stopping you from doing this.

However, if you took an existing privately licensed James Earl Jones eulogy and doctored it with AI trained data to replace another person's name with your name, then you'd be robbing Jones of his work product.

Waving your hands and saying "But maybe I didn't do the thing I did, so actually its fine" isn't a credible defense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

They insist it came from “another unnamed actress”.

Rumor has it they've kept her in a jar since birth, her only exposure to the world being through cameras hidden around the Julliard campus.