you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You are writing "anti-commercial AI," they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially. You have completely different motivations. One major difference between you and ProPublica is they must have interacted with some actual lawyers explaining how copyright works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially.

    That's just a description of what the license actually does, non-commercial usage of my content.

    It's actually not even my description, it's one I got from someone else, who's also licensing their content with the same license.

    I have no problem with my content being used for non-commercial purposes.

    You have completely different motivations.

    No, I do not. My intent aligns with ProPublica.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Your license doesn't do what you say it does."

    "Haha, joke's on you, I don't want it to do what I say it does."

    Glad we figured that one out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment