502
We have to stop ignoring AI’s hallucination problem (www.theverge.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
204 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No, but they approximate it. Which is fine for most use cases the person you're responding to described.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They're really, really bad at context. The main failure case isn't making things up, it's having text or image in part of the result not work right with text or image in another part because they can't even manage context across their own replies.

    See images with three hands, where bow strings mysteriously vanish etc.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago

    New models are like really good at context, the amount of input that can be given to them has exploded (fairly) recently... So you can give whole datasets or books as context and ask questions about them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent