▲ 381 ▼ Windows 11 will record all of your activity 24/7 (www.windowscentral.com) submitted 2 years ago by Renneder@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/becomeme@sh.itjust.works 124 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) It’s not that hard to disable snap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] fluckx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It isn't. But they are pushing it more aggressively. The latest release will tell you it can't even open .deb files anymore. The Ubuntu store will load indefinitely and not be able to install it. ( read it in a blog post ). And it's opening deb files in archive manager by default rather than the software centre. Even if it is just a bug. It is one they are refusing to fix ( and one that I can't imagine being difficult to solve ). It still works over CLI for now, which is how I usually install deb's. But if I have to go online to download all kinds of debs it feels like I'm back in the 90s windows downloading a bunch of exe's I no have to manage myself. It's more of a statement against Ubuntu and how canonical is handling the snap packages. Maybe it won't be so easy to disable it in the future. Or maybe apt will barely be able to install anything anymore if you disable snap since that seems to be all they went you to run. In any case. I don't really like the direction they're headed, and I'd rather not have to distro hop in two years because canonical decide to make snap mandatory. Snap has not worked out well for me in the past :(. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago I use Kubuntu, and it never pushed snaps to me, and disabling them took 5 mins. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago We're in a thread about Windows malfeasance and that's what the Windows users say about their ad-ridden trash heap of an OS. Why would we tolerate the same behavior just because it is on top of a Linux kernel? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It isn't. But they are pushing it more aggressively. The latest release will tell you it can't even open .deb files anymore. The Ubuntu store will load indefinitely and not be able to install it. ( read it in a blog post ). And it's opening deb files in archive manager by default rather than the software centre. Even if it is just a bug. It is one they are refusing to fix ( and one that I can't imagine being difficult to solve ). It still works over CLI for now, which is how I usually install deb's. But if I have to go online to download all kinds of debs it feels like I'm back in the 90s windows downloading a bunch of exe's I no have to manage myself. It's more of a statement against Ubuntu and how canonical is handling the snap packages. Maybe it won't be so easy to disable it in the future. Or maybe apt will barely be able to install anything anymore if you disable snap since that seems to be all they went you to run. In any case. I don't really like the direction they're headed, and I'd rather not have to distro hop in two years because canonical decide to make snap mandatory. Snap has not worked out well for me in the past :(. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago I use Kubuntu, and it never pushed snaps to me, and disabling them took 5 mins. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago I use Kubuntu, and it never pushed snaps to me, and disabling them took 5 mins. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago We're in a thread about Windows malfeasance and that's what the Windows users say about their ad-ridden trash heap of an OS. Why would we tolerate the same behavior just because it is on top of a Linux kernel? permalink fedilink source parent