The disgraceful Supreme Court justice should be held accountable for his actions but probably won't.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 29 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Because right-wingers are EXTREMELY, overwhelmingly, almost unanimously corrupt. They would never punish one of their own, no matter heinous, unethical, or repugnant the crime. They know that if they do not all stick together lock-step no matter what, their illegitimately stolen power will fall apart like used wet toiletpaper.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (34 children)

    left wingers are any better? I got one for you, the state is neither, it has both parties in it and only two parties. it is corrupt, rub two brain cells to together to arrive at a conclusion outside of the left/right framework. I know it is hard but work on it.

    like why are you even make this left right when most of us are the bottom?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago

    left wingers are any better?

    Yeah.

    Remember when Al Franken resigned because someone said they were bother by his actions decades ago? Remember how there were bipartisan investigations into Benghazi and Hillary emails? Or when Bill Clinton let an independent special prosecutor attempt to find evidence of corruption?

    How about how Lindsey Graham said that he would never support confirming a supreme court justice before a presidential election and then did that? Or how many of Trump's administration have went to jail?

    This "both sides are just as bad" number doesn't work when one side is activity lieing, curtailing freedoms and attempting literal coups, while the other side has obeyed due process and law the overwhelming majority of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    it is corrupt, rub two brain cells to together to arrive at a conclusion outside of the left/right framework.

    Weird that 1/2 of this framework, the D group, always votes against gigantic tax cuts for the rich, and the R group always votes for the exact opposite. Both sides are the same opposite of each other.

    like why are you even make this left right when most of us are the bottom?

    Because if you are at the bottom, you would be an extreme fool to vote for the party that consistently gives gigantic tax cuts to billionaires.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Centrist Democratic Politician: we want to exploit labor and centralize weath and power, but we want people to like us so we'll do some incrementally good things things to keep folks satisfied

    Centrist Republican Politician: we want to exploit labor and centralize weath and power, and fuck you. If you don't support us rapist minorities are going to rape you to death, or you might have to see people who aren't like you in public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (28 replies)
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    🎶Corruption 🎶.... jazz hands

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Because of politics.

    1. no chance of removing him
    2. Democrats just impeached Trump twice.
    3. expanding the court makes more sense
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    And you know that will never happen because the Democrats don't have a spine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Okay but you know expanding the court is a nuclear option. Like the current place we are in is there are 6 "conservative" judges and 3 "liberal" ones. So you would need to introduce 4 new supreme court justices at minimum to upset the current balance. While you are sort of ignoring the Senate has 49 republicans, 48 dems, and 3 "independents". So who again confirms supreme court justices? Oh yeah senate.... This is also ignoring you would have to make a new act to set the number of supreme court justices to 13 and who has majority control over house again? So lets fast forward to some future where dems have unquestionable control over the legislative branch of government where they can't be filibustered down. What exactly stops conservatives from just increasing that number once again to 18 or so when they have control?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›