this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
-19 points (36.2% liked)

RPGMemes

10146 readers
87 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And Hannah Montana is the lie of it being accessible to new players.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Roll a Gardening Lore check.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

As a trained grass toucher, I have proficiency so that would be: rolls dice 22 total.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is certainty one of the takes of all time

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Of all time!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Where funny?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

2e is weirder and more sexualized

My man did not play the same PF1e that I did.

Also, both games achieve different things. Neither is "better', you just like 1e more, congrats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

My man. The only group I've ever convinced to play GURPS had previously preferred Shadowrun 5e and Pathfinder 1e for all the highly specific rules. But your autism levels are clearly higher than any of us

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

This is a fever dream take lol

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's.. more.. sexualized? What? Could you explain that part to me lmao

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They just are old enough now to understand that paizo is a proud lgbt+ supporter and blame 2e

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Kinda my thoughts but I wanted to see if it was actually just "PF2E bad because it's canon is inclusive" or if there was something I was missing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile those who really know see 3.5e V3

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

L take, oldheads stay mad and unbalanced

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Take is too spicy. Would've worked better if you'd just kept to the fact that Billy Ray is plenty good if that's your style.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

PF1 is 3X based and therefore unplayable garbage. PF2 is an actually functional game.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Disagree, and you can pry my unplayable garbage from my cold dead hands

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago

PF2e actually exists because of D&D 5e. 5e is a streamlined and (most people believe) improved version of 3.5, which is exactly what PF1e is under a different label. But to appeal to their rebellious hipster demographic the new PF had to be different and innovative. So you get a bunch of overly complex rules for options and the sake of just being like D&D but still totally not D&D. The result is a decent game that definitely isn't 5e because it intentionally trades off most of the streamlining that makes 5e more approachable for the sake of complexity and options.

Basically it's a bunch of pretentious hipster BS.