this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
1458 points (98.9% liked)

Memes

45519 readers
1555 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 101 points 7 months ago (10 children)

The resistance to allowing WFH really shows how bullshit the push for EVs "to help the environment" is.

I'm not anti-EV and do believe they are better than ICE. But even better than an EV-driven mile is a mile that isn't driven at all.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 7 months ago (3 children)

None of my coworkers drive to the office and we actually like seeing each other.... Hybrid remote work is great for us

I think 90% of the problem is people being forced to drive everywhere

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Traffic would be so much better with a staggered work force. We might actually enjoy the commute.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

Or if they actually cared, they could build trains.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because of traffic, the workforce started staggering by themselves here if possible. The result was that bad traffic was spread out over the entire day instead of just two peaks in the morning and evening. Good traffic is only at night and working at night defeats the purpose of having business hours.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Some companies are doing it to create a hostile workplace to increase attrition. If an employee quits, they don't have to pay unemployment or severance. Other companies have huge investments in corporate real estate. They have been sitting on short-term loans that are coming due. The property owners are keeping their real-estate values artificially high, but to one wants to rent/lease them, so they aren't as valuable as in practice as they look on paper. Some companies get tax breaks from cities to put their offices there and will not continue to reap those rewards if their workers are not coming into the city. Don't let them gaslight you about culture or face time because that has all been debunked. A lot of remote workers are coming in to the office and sitting on Zoom/Teams calls in their cubicles.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck kind of weyland corporation do you guys work for.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Literally every corporation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Well, having the office was nice because I like my colleagues. I'm lucky in that regard though, and as nice as it was to socialise at work, working from home is nicer. Not to mention much much cheaper by every metric. In conclusion fuck ever going back to the office, thank you for coming to my TEDx Talk.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 7 months ago (7 children)

I personally like it too, but not daily. I average 1-2 days in office now and it's healthy for me. See my coworkers, they know my name, we catch up, have our meetings, then I go home for a few days again. I've just learned everyone is different, and the company definitely shouldn't be telling people how to work, people are grownups and can decide themselves. (And if they can't, then fire them instead of punishing everyone).

However for this meme, another great way to get people off the roads would be....... trains

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Working from home reduces emission much faster than electric cars.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Working from home is also considerably safer. The most dangerous part of most people's work day is their drive to and from work. If that time had to be covered by workplace injury insurance, management would be begging for as many people as possible to stay home just to keep insurance costs down.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Yeah it really doesn't help when everyone is driving worn out, pissed off, and/or fearing of retribution from being late due to things out of their control, like traffic, accidents, and sudden construction.

I have terrible time-blindness, so I'd frequently be one of those stressed out trying to make my commute. More often than not, I'd make it to the clock within 5 minutes or less!

There was a few times I felt pushed to make a risky turn where you're allowed to go but yield to oncoming traffic (who were also speeding to not get yelled at or fired, surely!)..., so I could clock in on time...then I thought...

"I refuse to die on my way to work. That would be so pathetically stupid."

Thankfully I quit when they wanted to get on people for being literally sixty seconds late.

Their answer is always "Just leave earlier?" If they had it their way you'd just be wasting hours of your life unpaid in the parking lot just for them. As if they're remotely worth it.

How many deaths are caused by a ridiculous obsession with punitive punctuality, which is hampered by forced office commute traffic, which encourages panicked angry driving?

I too, miss "covid traffic." Roads actually made sense then...

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If unions and OSHA really had teeth, they'd point out the significant health risks of having workers commute to work versus work from home. In terms of lives saved, work from home is much safer and we should fine companies accordingly when they force workers to commute when instead they could simply work from home. They should also be fined for environmental impact as well :)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

2802 - 7006 lives saved every year if wfh was allowed partially or all the way.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/remote-work-literally-saves-lives-peter-watridge

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago (1 children)

those first 3 months or so of covid were bliss. every office drone was off the road. it was so fucking easy to get everywhere, and it was quick too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What a depressing sight to behold

At least it's empty

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Better than an open office setting.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

I'd be fine with going into the office if public transportation could get me there, but it's a 15 minute drive vs 1.5 hours on the bus. And when I go into the office I just put in headphones with a YouTube documentary and don't talk to anyone. What's the point?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Ok, I need to tell someone else. The other day I ran into an acquaintance, John. He was telling me about his new manager job. Currently, everyone is working remote. An email was sent out to John's team inviting them to lunch so that the team could meet John in person.

Apparently, only 1 person showed up. John got butthurt. John told his boss that he thinks his team doesn't "engage enough" at work and that he thinks remote work is to blame. John told me he likes to test people randomly by sending them a Slack message and seeing how long it takes to respond. Apparently, he thinks 5 minutes for a response means people aren't at the computer working. John has convinced his boss to force people back in the office...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Look forward to the follow-up where he has to explain why they are losing the good team members

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Meanwhile, my lead, who insists I drive 40km which takes 70 minutes one way:

"I can't do teams meetings for design discussions, I don't like drawing with my mouse"

Me: "OK, get a Wacom tablet or wtv and draw with that?"

Him: "No, just come to the office" for our 5 min talks we have occasionally and the once every two weeks 1 hr discussion

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If only they could somehow have a webcam point at their desk to show you what they're drawing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

There's like a $10 app called super display that will turn any android device into a touch monitor, pair that with one of those precision styluses with the plastic disc on the end, you got a ~$20 dollar drawing tablet!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Hint: it isn't about the Drawing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Unnecessary RTO should be outlawed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Here's my theory: bad bosses want you to be there in person because they think you're lazy.

My old job: there was a constant cloud of mistrust I got when I worked there, just a feeling of unease. I can't really describe it. Like everyone was just a little bit unhappy with their job. It wasn't related to the work we were doing, it was the working conditions. Everyone seemed unhappy with some policy. I consistently heard bickering about management and idiotic decisions, plus the usual customer complaints about clients making bad decisions or doing ridiculous things, but that's normal and nobody seemed miffed about it, just discussing it.

They had a "hybrid" work setup, each person was "allowed" to work remotely one day of the week, each week. The selection of which day was up to each worker and their team/manager to schedule. The expectation was that someone would be in office at all times on every team. Most teams were 3-4 people, so it generally meant that only one person was working remotely at a time.

So let me compound this, and I'll note, there's no exaggeration here, this is what happened. While working, we were obligated to be in a teams meeting all day long, 9 times out of 10 it was expected that we were on cam the entire day. Frequently these teams meetings were only the team in question, but the justification was that we were in there in case a manager/team leader/whatever, could pop in and talk to the team if they needed to, and/or if the manager was working remotely. It was pretty rare that happened. The other excuse was so that the team could chat about challenges and discuss any client issues they needed to collaborate on, which most teams just used text chat to do, so the meeting was unnecessary. During my time there, I made several suggestions for improvements and they all fell on deaf ears. Nothing changed. The excuses were poor, and I don't recall them very clearly because they were largely nonsense. Needless to say, the situation sucked.

I had to drive into the office for about 1h+ each day, and at least the same coming home, so around 2.5h of my day was my commute. I pleaded for more work from home/remote, but it was denied at every turn. Add this to the fact that there was no company provided parking, and parking in that area started at about $70/mo, and went up from there. The nearest parking areas were the most costly at $130+ and they were in high demand, some had wait lists for monthly passes because they simply did not have enough parking spots for everyone that wanted them.

There were probably dozens of other frustrations I could list, I'll limit myself to one more: my job is IT support, and we largely use remote access software for everything, so it literally does not matter where I work from. As long as I have an internet connection, I can do my job.

I didn't last 2 years under those conditions. I barely made it to 1 year.... There's a whole story as to why I don't work there anymore, but it's not relevant to the point. My point is, I was untrusted, and treated as though I should just shut up and create value for the shareholders, and be happy about it. By the way, the shareholders were the managers.

Contrast with the place I'm working now: I'm provided with $1000 of home office set up funds up front. I have a home office already set up, but I found some nice-to-have things that I was able to get with that money. I was shipped a brand new laptop and dock, which the old place gave me a used, old, crappy, end of life/end of support system. They also provided me with a UPS, keyboard, mouse, and three monitors, webcam, headset, etc. Before I even worked my first shift, all shipped to me directly. This job is 100% work from home, and this workplace doesn't even have an official office space. The only exception is when hands-on is required, or there's a team event, and we take over a client's board room for a day, so we can work from there, which has been less than once a month. I've met my team in person exactly twice in the three+ months I've worked at this place.

Any suggestions I have are discussed and considered. I feel heard. Some suggestions have already been implemented, others are still under consideration or have been denied with good reasons (usually a technical limitation regarding the systems we use). I don't need to sit in on useless meetings all day that accomplish nothing, I can listen to music while I get things done without being distracted by my co-workers eating their lunch and forgetting to hit mute. I "see" my team once a day for a stand up to check in on progress and workload. I feel supported, trusted, and I'm free to work in whatever conditions I find are most condusive to getting things done.

As a matter of fact: both jobs require time tracking, the old job I struggled to account for (approx) 5 hrs of my 8 hour shift, at the new job, I frequently can account for (approx) 7 hours of my day without issue.

My boss is good, trusting, and friendly. Compared to the cloud of discontent my old boss would inspire, and the work shows through on that. I'm happier, and I enjoy work again.

I recently heard that the old job nixed hybrid and went full RTO.

QED: Good bosses trust that you'll do your job and let you do that from wherever you can. Bad bosses want to control you into doing it "their way or the highway".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's micromanaging. They don't know how to lead properly. When I went through McDonald's shift manager training they taught the concept of letting your workers do their job, so you could do yours. They literally said to work with your hands in your pockets so that you wouldn't be tempted to take over and get distracted by going back to what you used to do. A Managers job is to provide their team with whatever they need to do their job effectively. A baseball coach wouldn't go out on the field and bat or play the outfield.

That manager probably started off doing the job you were doing and got promoted by kissing ass or being a toxic worker and therefore causing everyone else to leave/ perform lower because they were avoiding that person.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Them: I need you in the office so I can keep you under my finger!

Me: Bro do you know how much in rent and power you're gonna save keeping them at home?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Boss: you are not allowed to with from home

Same boss: I'll be working from work, I need to service my car

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's hypocrisy all the way down. Microsoft is telling people to run their 144hz screens at 60hz to save the planet while sending thousands of good computers to the landfill with their stupid TPM requirements. Never believed this "carbon footprint" garbage, never will. You are the carbon that they want to reduce.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I Like how he becomes so angry that he starts to bleed 😂

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hey boss, you want to put these servers in the cloud?

Oh and by the way, me working from home is the human equivalent of working in the cloud.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Majority of the wealthy higher ups in corporate management don't care about reducing emissions. They care about making their companies look good.

Talking about working towards climate change goals or talking about supporting marginalized groups is easy. Actually doing something is a lot different, but even today very few people look for actions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

I save $7 per day working from home while I can listen to death metal.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

If offices REALLY want their workers in their buildings they've known for years that they have the options of using the real estate of the surface area* on the building itself to place solar and offset their demand massively. They can also incentivise massively to help their workers use electric vehicles - no not cars but ebikes, scooters and electric motorcycles and provide secure parking and charging. For those that use these, give them a bonus, buy the bike for them. Bikes free up staff parking to be used for other things.

*the sides of the building can also be used to hang panels, so if the roof is occupied with air con systems etc you still get power. There is usually just a 10% drop off in daily power generation, too, but an advantage is both that the panel cools more effectively in this position, and it also cools the building passively by shading the sun.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Honestly I think we’re going to hit a wall where we realize we need about half as many “office drones” as we have in a couple years.

So many people with office jobs drive in, sit at a desk, and do maybe 2 hours of actual work in the entire day. Or they work from home and do the same. And then they collect their 95k/year salary.

I really dunno if people are prepared for businesses to start going “wait, what are all of these people doing?” And axing their workforce and replacing most of them with AI or existing other employees

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (18 children)

The thing you're not accounting for is that work that primarily involves thought, which is what "office drones" are doing, aren't productive in the same way that physical or service jobs are.
Looking off into space thinking is part of the work. People average about four hours of productive work in an eight hour day.

The thing you can't do is get rid of half the people and then expect the other half to magically be eight hours productive per day. Businesses keep trying and weirdly it just tanks their output.

AI is not the panacea that so many people think it is. Do you feel happy when you need help with something you bought and you get an AI trying to offer you helpful articles or tips? I don't. Do you want the same level of service from the entity that controls where your paycheck gets deposited or fixed your HSA contributions?

If you definition of work is butts in chairs typing, office workers don't do too much work. But that's a very naive definition of what most office workers are actually doing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Incredibly well said. I'm saving this.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Only if the environmental narrative was cohesive and consistent lol.

If govts really cared about the environment they would push companies into remote working as much as possible instead of pushing for electric cars that are a hazard to the planet.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›