this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
489 points (94.5% liked)

Bicycles

3119 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to [email protected]

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!

Community Rules

Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
489
Cycling is ten times more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities (theconversation.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Globally, only one in 50 new cars were fully electric in 2020, and one in 14 in the UK. Sounds impressive, but even if all new cars were electric now, it would still take 15-20 years to replace the world’s fossil fuel car fleet.

The emission savings from replacing all those internal combustion engines with zero-carbon alternatives will not feed in fast enough to make the necessary difference in the time we can spare: the next five years. Tackling the climate and air pollution crises requires curbing all motorised transport, particularly private cars, as quickly as possible. Focusing solely on electric vehicles is slowing down the race to zero emissions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cool. What about all those people who live within 5km of where they need to go, and are generally alone in the car.

Just because it doesn’t apply to you in particular doesn’t mean you can’t support and champion a cause that would help in the grand scheme of things.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The comment I replied to implied that if people in Montreal can do it, why can't I? I was merely addressing the implied accusation.

Besides, if you want a champion the guy making $40k/year isn't it.

The billionaires got a lot of money to spend on transit and infrastructure and densification, but everytime this shit comes up somehow the guy who barely clears the fuckin poverty line is the one who has be a champion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

the guy making $40k/year isn't it

Why not? Once regular people do environmentally friendly things, we've essentially won, because that means the environmentally friendly things is the most reasonable and cost effective things. As in, we've normalized the desired behavior.

Getting a billionaire to change isn't going to work, that's like trying to push a goat in the direction you want them to go. That hasn't worked in the past, and it's not going to start now.

Focus on where the efforts are most likely to actually have an impact. We should be improving mass transit, pushing cars outside of cities, and encouraging cycling. That will cut road maintenance costs, drastically reduce traffic, and improve the health of the average person. Let billionaires do what they want, let's make cities something people want to live in. That starts by focusing on the guy that makes $40k/year and making sure he can get to work and back efficiently.