610
Why Mozilla is betting on a decentralized social networking future (techcrunch.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.ml
53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The mission-driven tech company behind the Firefox browser, Pocket reader and other apps is now investing its energy into the so-called “fediverse” — a collection of decentralized social networking applications, like Mastodon, that communicate with one another over the ActivityPub protocol.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 147 points 2 years ago (12 children)

I thought they were just adding activitypub to some products / making their own accounts but

However, the company is aiming to tackle some of the obstacles that have prevented users from joining and participating in the fediverse so far, including the technical hurdles around onboarding, finding people to follow and discovering interesting content to discuss.

What Mozilla wants to accomplish, then, is to help reconfigure the Mastodon onboarding process so that when someone — including a publisher or creator — joins its instance (or the fediverse in general) they’re able to build their audience with more ease.

Now THAT would be cool. If the browser had a built in way to handle some of this stuff, it would be a lot simpler to deal with some of the issues. I'd love to learn more

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago* (9 children)

    This is literally the bottleneck of all of fediverse imo.

    With ease of use integrated into the fediverse, half of social media could become irrelevant.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    My brain went "Firefox has what 7% market share? What's 50% of that?? Actually, that probably is 4x the 'Fediverse' user total right there"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    4.87% on North American Desktops, 6.16% worldwide, 10.77% in Europe, 17.43% in Germany. Not even showing up on mobile and tablet, here's the numbers.

    World-wide usage of adblock is much higher, 42.7%, so if Google actually goes through with their plan Chrome is going to lose market share, massively.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    I feel like if Firefox added features for the fediverse, they'd do it in a way that other browsers could implement it too.

    With Facebook and Tumblr working on Fediverse stuff, it would be weird if Chrome didn't add the features too

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

    [This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    7 was a stand in for a single digit numbet.. didn't realize it was that low. Yikes

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Three percent of all browsers is a fuckton of users, considering that includes mobile users who are going to be less likely to change their browser then desktop users. There is an estimated 6.92 billion smartphone users. Three percent of that is more users than there are people in the United States.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Edge allows you to "follow" YouTube channels outside of the website itself, not sure how deep that integration goes though as I've never bothered to use it.

    Also this is the idea behind Grayjay, where creators would be able to have a "universal identity" across platforms.
    For now it's mostly a YouTube and some other video streaming sites alternative.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent