▲ 632 ▼ Brave browser quietly slips a VPN service onto your Windows PC (www.androidcentral.com) submitted 2 years ago by AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 266 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 210 points 2 years ago (2 children) BuT bRaVE isN't ThaT bAd 🤡 permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 118 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) Yep, this news actually broke a couple days ago, I remember seeing a Brave fanboy having a meltdown over it and ranting about how Mozilla is the real shady company, blah, blah, blah. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (4 children) Oh dear lord. What did they say in support of their “Mozilla is shady” argument? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 71 points 2 years ago Brave's CEO was fired from Mozilla so Mozilla bad. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 18 points 2 years ago* (3 children) To be fair. Mozilla foundation is shady. They keep pushing things that don't follow their core mission. That try to expand their brand. You can use Mozilla to build solid privacy respecting systems, but Firefox out of the box not so much. They're better than Google, but that's a low fucking bar. Mullvad browser, Tor browser, mull for Android - all use the core Firefox open source engine, to make privacy respecting programs that work out of the box with privacy respecting defaults. So I would say Mozilla is a good guy in this conversation, but not a saint. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 child) Though they are transparent with the fact that they are doing it. I'm not a fan of it either, but it's not too shady when they're open about it IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Fair enough, they aren't evil to be sure. The Mozilla telemetry, pocket, Mozilla synchronization, experiments, the new tab page basically being an advertisement page. That leaves the sour taste in my mouth, so I don't trust them because of that... Shady good guy vibes:) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It's not great, but it's not like they're installing malware in the background. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/ They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore. I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent [+] adam_b@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent [–] clegko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla's purchase of them has made them better if anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0xD@infosec.pub 11 points 2 years ago They keep trying to make money so they don't go under if/when Google pulls the plug on their easy money. permalink fedilink source parent [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Fair enough. I'm glad it works for you. For what it's worth mullvad browser works for all of my use cases, I haven't found anything it doesn't work for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You can open up the no script options and click on disable globally. Sorry to hear mullvad's not loading anything. Seems like a weird bug Setting the default browser, is a problem on Windows, there is a workaround I could dig up for you if you want. But basically you have to make a script and then modify the registry to point to that script as the default browser. It's a pain in the butt but it works. Thankfully on Linux, and Mac OS it just works as the default browser permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] whale@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] db2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably something about Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah if it's the comment chain that I think they're referring to, I believe it came down to Mozilla "being in bed with Google" because Google is the default search engine. I'll take the default search engine being Google over things like affiliate links being hijacked, but maybe I'm crazy for taking that position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Typical Brave user hating google while using chrome with preinstalled extensions. Everything about that browser is the opposite of what it should be. Same with the users. permalink fedilink source parent [+] whale@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] kirk781@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I follow Ghacks, a tech site, as well and boy there is a Brave shill on there who attacks everyone there for daring to say anything against it. He knows stuff, judging from his comments, yet is so anti Mozilla and pro Brave that I can't understand. Almost thinks anyone not using Brave is inferior. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dustyData@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) It's not good to stereotype people. But, I would bet money that they have any three of these: bought NFCs NFTs unironically, supports OpenAI unconditionally, propose blockchain on everything, bought a pizza with bitcoin years ago that would be millions of dollars today and are still salty about it, have a Starlink receiver, drive a beaten down Tesla they can't afford to repair because they spent their money paying for FSD early access, and would definitely be first in line to fly Starship to Mars if they were allowed to, they posts to imageai regularly. EDIT: autocorrect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kirk781@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Yes, that pizza for Bitcoin story is quite popular, though it happened in very early days of the currency. Also, I assume you meant NFTs instead of NFCs :p. For a second, I was wondering what did near field communication had to do with this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* don't you just love projection? cant accept the facts, so deflect the criticism to something else that is in no way a valid target for them. permalink fedilink source parent [+] cley_faye@lemmy.world -17 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Mozilla foundation is super shady, and some Firefox devs does have it in them to change stuff to piss off people. It doesn't excuse Brave though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please cite an actual source for that claim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Their public reports were a fair share of the money goes to its administration, were the dev funds are lower each years, were some funded orgs does not seem to exist, with the addition of actual user contribution being a drop in the ocean of money influx, is the source for the "shady" part. Me (and many other) having long debates on their bugzilla about changes they made that ignore user settings, against all common practices, with no chance of reverting them because they knew better, until some big service (say, gmail) is impacted at which point all their arguments are forgotten and the changes are reverted, for the pissing of people part. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sneezymrmilo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've actually been attacked on several occasions by brave fan boys when I casually mentioned that I switched to Firefox and loved it. Idk what their deal is but I find it hilarious that all this stuff is coming out about brave recently 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] willis936@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago They're literally on the payroll. It's a pyramid scheme. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 118 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) Yep, this news actually broke a couple days ago, I remember seeing a Brave fanboy having a meltdown over it and ranting about how Mozilla is the real shady company, blah, blah, blah. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (4 children) Oh dear lord. What did they say in support of their “Mozilla is shady” argument? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 71 points 2 years ago Brave's CEO was fired from Mozilla so Mozilla bad. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 18 points 2 years ago* (3 children) To be fair. Mozilla foundation is shady. They keep pushing things that don't follow their core mission. That try to expand their brand. You can use Mozilla to build solid privacy respecting systems, but Firefox out of the box not so much. They're better than Google, but that's a low fucking bar. Mullvad browser, Tor browser, mull for Android - all use the core Firefox open source engine, to make privacy respecting programs that work out of the box with privacy respecting defaults. So I would say Mozilla is a good guy in this conversation, but not a saint. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 child) Though they are transparent with the fact that they are doing it. I'm not a fan of it either, but it's not too shady when they're open about it IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Fair enough, they aren't evil to be sure. The Mozilla telemetry, pocket, Mozilla synchronization, experiments, the new tab page basically being an advertisement page. That leaves the sour taste in my mouth, so I don't trust them because of that... Shady good guy vibes:) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It's not great, but it's not like they're installing malware in the background. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/ They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore. I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent [+] adam_b@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent [–] clegko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla's purchase of them has made them better if anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0xD@infosec.pub 11 points 2 years ago They keep trying to make money so they don't go under if/when Google pulls the plug on their easy money. permalink fedilink source parent [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Fair enough. I'm glad it works for you. For what it's worth mullvad browser works for all of my use cases, I haven't found anything it doesn't work for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You can open up the no script options and click on disable globally. Sorry to hear mullvad's not loading anything. Seems like a weird bug Setting the default browser, is a problem on Windows, there is a workaround I could dig up for you if you want. But basically you have to make a script and then modify the registry to point to that script as the default browser. It's a pain in the butt but it works. Thankfully on Linux, and Mac OS it just works as the default browser permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] whale@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] db2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably something about Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah if it's the comment chain that I think they're referring to, I believe it came down to Mozilla "being in bed with Google" because Google is the default search engine. I'll take the default search engine being Google over things like affiliate links being hijacked, but maybe I'm crazy for taking that position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Typical Brave user hating google while using chrome with preinstalled extensions. Everything about that browser is the opposite of what it should be. Same with the users. permalink fedilink source parent [+] whale@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] kirk781@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I follow Ghacks, a tech site, as well and boy there is a Brave shill on there who attacks everyone there for daring to say anything against it. He knows stuff, judging from his comments, yet is so anti Mozilla and pro Brave that I can't understand. Almost thinks anyone not using Brave is inferior. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dustyData@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) It's not good to stereotype people. But, I would bet money that they have any three of these: bought NFCs NFTs unironically, supports OpenAI unconditionally, propose blockchain on everything, bought a pizza with bitcoin years ago that would be millions of dollars today and are still salty about it, have a Starlink receiver, drive a beaten down Tesla they can't afford to repair because they spent their money paying for FSD early access, and would definitely be first in line to fly Starship to Mars if they were allowed to, they posts to imageai regularly. EDIT: autocorrect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kirk781@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Yes, that pizza for Bitcoin story is quite popular, though it happened in very early days of the currency. Also, I assume you meant NFTs instead of NFCs :p. For a second, I was wondering what did near field communication had to do with this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* don't you just love projection? cant accept the facts, so deflect the criticism to something else that is in no way a valid target for them. permalink fedilink source parent [+] cley_faye@lemmy.world -17 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Mozilla foundation is super shady, and some Firefox devs does have it in them to change stuff to piss off people. It doesn't excuse Brave though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please cite an actual source for that claim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Their public reports were a fair share of the money goes to its administration, were the dev funds are lower each years, were some funded orgs does not seem to exist, with the addition of actual user contribution being a drop in the ocean of money influx, is the source for the "shady" part. Me (and many other) having long debates on their bugzilla about changes they made that ignore user settings, against all common practices, with no chance of reverting them because they knew better, until some big service (say, gmail) is impacted at which point all their arguments are forgotten and the changes are reverted, for the pissing of people part. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (4 children) Oh dear lord. What did they say in support of their “Mozilla is shady” argument? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 71 points 2 years ago Brave's CEO was fired from Mozilla so Mozilla bad. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 18 points 2 years ago* (3 children) To be fair. Mozilla foundation is shady. They keep pushing things that don't follow their core mission. That try to expand their brand. You can use Mozilla to build solid privacy respecting systems, but Firefox out of the box not so much. They're better than Google, but that's a low fucking bar. Mullvad browser, Tor browser, mull for Android - all use the core Firefox open source engine, to make privacy respecting programs that work out of the box with privacy respecting defaults. So I would say Mozilla is a good guy in this conversation, but not a saint. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 child) Though they are transparent with the fact that they are doing it. I'm not a fan of it either, but it's not too shady when they're open about it IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Fair enough, they aren't evil to be sure. The Mozilla telemetry, pocket, Mozilla synchronization, experiments, the new tab page basically being an advertisement page. That leaves the sour taste in my mouth, so I don't trust them because of that... Shady good guy vibes:) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It's not great, but it's not like they're installing malware in the background. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/ They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore. I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent [+] adam_b@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent [–] clegko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla's purchase of them has made them better if anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0xD@infosec.pub 11 points 2 years ago They keep trying to make money so they don't go under if/when Google pulls the plug on their easy money. permalink fedilink source parent [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Fair enough. I'm glad it works for you. For what it's worth mullvad browser works for all of my use cases, I haven't found anything it doesn't work for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You can open up the no script options and click on disable globally. Sorry to hear mullvad's not loading anything. Seems like a weird bug Setting the default browser, is a problem on Windows, there is a workaround I could dig up for you if you want. But basically you have to make a script and then modify the registry to point to that script as the default browser. It's a pain in the butt but it works. Thankfully on Linux, and Mac OS it just works as the default browser permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] whale@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] db2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably something about Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah if it's the comment chain that I think they're referring to, I believe it came down to Mozilla "being in bed with Google" because Google is the default search engine. I'll take the default search engine being Google over things like affiliate links being hijacked, but maybe I'm crazy for taking that position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Typical Brave user hating google while using chrome with preinstalled extensions. Everything about that browser is the opposite of what it should be. Same with the users. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 71 points 2 years ago Brave's CEO was fired from Mozilla so Mozilla bad. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 18 points 2 years ago* (3 children) To be fair. Mozilla foundation is shady. They keep pushing things that don't follow their core mission. That try to expand their brand. You can use Mozilla to build solid privacy respecting systems, but Firefox out of the box not so much. They're better than Google, but that's a low fucking bar. Mullvad browser, Tor browser, mull for Android - all use the core Firefox open source engine, to make privacy respecting programs that work out of the box with privacy respecting defaults. So I would say Mozilla is a good guy in this conversation, but not a saint. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 child) Though they are transparent with the fact that they are doing it. I'm not a fan of it either, but it's not too shady when they're open about it IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Fair enough, they aren't evil to be sure. The Mozilla telemetry, pocket, Mozilla synchronization, experiments, the new tab page basically being an advertisement page. That leaves the sour taste in my mouth, so I don't trust them because of that... Shady good guy vibes:) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It's not great, but it's not like they're installing malware in the background. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/ They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore. I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent [+] adam_b@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent [–] clegko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla's purchase of them has made them better if anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0xD@infosec.pub 11 points 2 years ago They keep trying to make money so they don't go under if/when Google pulls the plug on their easy money. permalink fedilink source parent [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Fair enough. I'm glad it works for you. For what it's worth mullvad browser works for all of my use cases, I haven't found anything it doesn't work for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You can open up the no script options and click on disable globally. Sorry to hear mullvad's not loading anything. Seems like a weird bug Setting the default browser, is a problem on Windows, there is a workaround I could dig up for you if you want. But basically you have to make a script and then modify the registry to point to that script as the default browser. It's a pain in the butt but it works. Thankfully on Linux, and Mac OS it just works as the default browser permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 child) Though they are transparent with the fact that they are doing it. I'm not a fan of it either, but it's not too shady when they're open about it IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Fair enough, they aren't evil to be sure. The Mozilla telemetry, pocket, Mozilla synchronization, experiments, the new tab page basically being an advertisement page. That leaves the sour taste in my mouth, so I don't trust them because of that... Shady good guy vibes:) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It's not great, but it's not like they're installing malware in the background. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/ They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore. I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent [+] adam_b@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent [–] clegko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla's purchase of them has made them better if anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Fair enough, they aren't evil to be sure. The Mozilla telemetry, pocket, Mozilla synchronization, experiments, the new tab page basically being an advertisement page. That leaves the sour taste in my mouth, so I don't trust them because of that... Shady good guy vibes:) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It's not great, but it's not like they're installing malware in the background. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/ They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore. I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent [+] adam_b@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent [–] clegko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla's purchase of them has made them better if anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) They're doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It's not great, but it's not like they're installing malware in the background. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/ They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore. I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent [+] adam_b@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/ They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore. I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent [+] adam_b@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 years ago* That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed. But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out permalink fedilink source parent
[+] adam_b@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* This is an old issue, I was just linking to it to reference why I have friendly relations with Firefox but I doubt they're intentions, or at least I consider them an ally but one that needs to be double checked. The date on that post is clearly wrong. Maybe they got some weird content management system that's updating the date and correctly or they made an edit or something permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clegko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla's purchase of them has made them better if anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 11 points 2 years ago They keep trying to make money so they don't go under if/when Google pulls the plug on their easy money. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Fair enough. I'm glad it works for you. For what it's worth mullvad browser works for all of my use cases, I haven't found anything it doesn't work for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You can open up the no script options and click on disable globally. Sorry to hear mullvad's not loading anything. Seems like a weird bug Setting the default browser, is a problem on Windows, there is a workaround I could dig up for you if you want. But basically you have to make a script and then modify the registry to point to that script as the default browser. It's a pain in the butt but it works. Thankfully on Linux, and Mac OS it just works as the default browser permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Fair enough. I'm glad it works for you. For what it's worth mullvad browser works for all of my use cases, I haven't found anything it doesn't work for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You can open up the no script options and click on disable globally. Sorry to hear mullvad's not loading anything. Seems like a weird bug Setting the default browser, is a problem on Windows, there is a workaround I could dig up for you if you want. But basically you have to make a script and then modify the registry to point to that script as the default browser. It's a pain in the butt but it works. Thankfully on Linux, and Mac OS it just works as the default browser permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You can open up the no script options and click on disable globally. Sorry to hear mullvad's not loading anything. Seems like a weird bug Setting the default browser, is a problem on Windows, there is a workaround I could dig up for you if you want. But basically you have to make a script and then modify the registry to point to that script as the default browser. It's a pain in the butt but it works. Thankfully on Linux, and Mac OS it just works as the default browser permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) You can open up the no script options and click on disable globally. Sorry to hear mullvad's not loading anything. Seems like a weird bug Setting the default browser, is a problem on Windows, there is a workaround I could dig up for you if you want. But basically you have to make a script and then modify the registry to point to that script as the default browser. It's a pain in the butt but it works. Thankfully on Linux, and Mac OS it just works as the default browser permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) On Qubes it just worked after I did --register-app Their GitHub has an issue open for it in Linux, I see that the tor project is working on a solution as well to make it more elegant. But since it doesn't load any web pages for you, you don't want to make it your default anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] whale@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Probably something about Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah if it's the comment chain that I think they're referring to, I believe it came down to Mozilla "being in bed with Google" because Google is the default search engine. I'll take the default search engine being Google over things like affiliate links being hijacked, but maybe I'm crazy for taking that position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Typical Brave user hating google while using chrome with preinstalled extensions. Everything about that browser is the opposite of what it should be. Same with the users. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah if it's the comment chain that I think they're referring to, I believe it came down to Mozilla "being in bed with Google" because Google is the default search engine. I'll take the default search engine being Google over things like affiliate links being hijacked, but maybe I'm crazy for taking that position. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Typical Brave user hating google while using chrome with preinstalled extensions. Everything about that browser is the opposite of what it should be. Same with the users. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Typical Brave user hating google while using chrome with preinstalled extensions. Everything about that browser is the opposite of what it should be. Same with the users. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] whale@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kirk781@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I follow Ghacks, a tech site, as well and boy there is a Brave shill on there who attacks everyone there for daring to say anything against it. He knows stuff, judging from his comments, yet is so anti Mozilla and pro Brave that I can't understand. Almost thinks anyone not using Brave is inferior. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dustyData@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) It's not good to stereotype people. But, I would bet money that they have any three of these: bought NFCs NFTs unironically, supports OpenAI unconditionally, propose blockchain on everything, bought a pizza with bitcoin years ago that would be millions of dollars today and are still salty about it, have a Starlink receiver, drive a beaten down Tesla they can't afford to repair because they spent their money paying for FSD early access, and would definitely be first in line to fly Starship to Mars if they were allowed to, they posts to imageai regularly. EDIT: autocorrect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kirk781@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Yes, that pizza for Bitcoin story is quite popular, though it happened in very early days of the currency. Also, I assume you meant NFTs instead of NFCs :p. For a second, I was wondering what did near field communication had to do with this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) It's not good to stereotype people. But, I would bet money that they have any three of these: bought NFCs NFTs unironically, supports OpenAI unconditionally, propose blockchain on everything, bought a pizza with bitcoin years ago that would be millions of dollars today and are still salty about it, have a Starlink receiver, drive a beaten down Tesla they can't afford to repair because they spent their money paying for FSD early access, and would definitely be first in line to fly Starship to Mars if they were allowed to, they posts to imageai regularly. EDIT: autocorrect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kirk781@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Yes, that pizza for Bitcoin story is quite popular, though it happened in very early days of the currency. Also, I assume you meant NFTs instead of NFCs :p. For a second, I was wondering what did near field communication had to do with this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kirk781@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Yes, that pizza for Bitcoin story is quite popular, though it happened in very early days of the currency. Also, I assume you meant NFTs instead of NFCs :p. For a second, I was wondering what did near field communication had to do with this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* don't you just love projection? cant accept the facts, so deflect the criticism to something else that is in no way a valid target for them. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] cley_faye@lemmy.world -17 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Mozilla foundation is super shady, and some Firefox devs does have it in them to change stuff to piss off people. It doesn't excuse Brave though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please cite an actual source for that claim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Their public reports were a fair share of the money goes to its administration, were the dev funds are lower each years, were some funded orgs does not seem to exist, with the addition of actual user contribution being a drop in the ocean of money influx, is the source for the "shady" part. Me (and many other) having long debates on their bugzilla about changes they made that ignore user settings, against all common practices, with no chance of reverting them because they knew better, until some big service (say, gmail) is impacted at which point all their arguments are forgotten and the changes are reverted, for the pissing of people part. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please cite an actual source for that claim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Their public reports were a fair share of the money goes to its administration, were the dev funds are lower each years, were some funded orgs does not seem to exist, with the addition of actual user contribution being a drop in the ocean of money influx, is the source for the "shady" part. Me (and many other) having long debates on their bugzilla about changes they made that ignore user settings, against all common practices, with no chance of reverting them because they knew better, until some big service (say, gmail) is impacted at which point all their arguments are forgotten and the changes are reverted, for the pissing of people part. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Their public reports were a fair share of the money goes to its administration, were the dev funds are lower each years, were some funded orgs does not seem to exist, with the addition of actual user contribution being a drop in the ocean of money influx, is the source for the "shady" part. Me (and many other) having long debates on their bugzilla about changes they made that ignore user settings, against all common practices, with no chance of reverting them because they knew better, until some big service (say, gmail) is impacted at which point all their arguments are forgotten and the changes are reverted, for the pissing of people part. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sneezymrmilo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've actually been attacked on several occasions by brave fan boys when I casually mentioned that I switched to Firefox and loved it. Idk what their deal is but I find it hilarious that all this stuff is coming out about brave recently 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] willis936@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago They're literally on the payroll. It's a pyramid scheme. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] willis936@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago They're literally on the payroll. It's a pyramid scheme. permalink fedilink source parent