▲ 354 ▼ Waiting For the Fall (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] marcuse1w@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (58 children) What do you hope comes after it ? permalink fedilink source hideshow 58 child comments replies: [–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 17 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pure chaos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WYLD_STALLYNS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago No, this is Patrick permalink fedilink source parent [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 14 points 2 years ago (47 children) Socialist phase where means of production are owned by the workers, and then communism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 47 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (43 children) You can have cooperatives right now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 43 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (42 children) The problem there is getting the initial seed funding. Investors put money into companies because they want to have control over the company, and they can't do that with a cooperative. There is a systemic bias towards capitalist company structure because of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 42 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (41 children) Investors want to make money above all. You can issue bonds with favorable interest rates as long as you have a solid business. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 41 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (40 children) The reality clearly demonstrates that investors don't bother investing in coops. You've obviously never actually tried to get investors to invest in a coop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 40 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (39 children) No I haven't. But I expect that the search for people who want to participate in an expanding cooperative is the bigger problem. Do you know of a cooperative that wants to issue bonds? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 39 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago (38 children) I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (37 children) Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them. It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments load more comments (37 replies) [–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) No ofense but... LoL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Laugh while you can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Ok permalink fedilink source parent [–] nevial@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago Winter permalink fedilink source parent [–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (6 children) Anarchist government, preferably communist in nature but mutualist works too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Plenty if you study history and anthropology. How do you think humans lived for millenia before the invention of currency? You do realize thousands of years separate that from advent of trade and long after we settled down to form permanent communities? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Nonsense. There is no returning to small-scale egalitarian societies. Large-scale societies are a trap; once you embrace them, you can never go back apart from in extreme isolation. Spend even 5 minutes thinking seriously about it and you will see why it's a pipe dream. permalink fedilink source parent [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) You think there is no authority in anarchist government? Have you ever read about horizontal-democracies? Anarchist just means "against coercive authorities" namely "centralized and hierarchical governance" You realize the fediverse that creates lemmy is an anarchist structure right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 17 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pure chaos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WYLD_STALLYNS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago No, this is Patrick permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WYLD_STALLYNS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago No, this is Patrick permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 14 points 2 years ago (47 children) Socialist phase where means of production are owned by the workers, and then communism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 47 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (43 children) You can have cooperatives right now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 43 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (42 children) The problem there is getting the initial seed funding. Investors put money into companies because they want to have control over the company, and they can't do that with a cooperative. There is a systemic bias towards capitalist company structure because of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 42 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (41 children) Investors want to make money above all. You can issue bonds with favorable interest rates as long as you have a solid business. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 41 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (40 children) The reality clearly demonstrates that investors don't bother investing in coops. You've obviously never actually tried to get investors to invest in a coop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 40 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (39 children) No I haven't. But I expect that the search for people who want to participate in an expanding cooperative is the bigger problem. Do you know of a cooperative that wants to issue bonds? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 39 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago (38 children) I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (37 children) Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them. It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments load more comments (37 replies) [–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) No ofense but... LoL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Laugh while you can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Ok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (43 children) You can have cooperatives right now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 43 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (42 children) The problem there is getting the initial seed funding. Investors put money into companies because they want to have control over the company, and they can't do that with a cooperative. There is a systemic bias towards capitalist company structure because of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 42 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (41 children) Investors want to make money above all. You can issue bonds with favorable interest rates as long as you have a solid business. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 41 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (40 children) The reality clearly demonstrates that investors don't bother investing in coops. You've obviously never actually tried to get investors to invest in a coop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 40 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (39 children) No I haven't. But I expect that the search for people who want to participate in an expanding cooperative is the bigger problem. Do you know of a cooperative that wants to issue bonds? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 39 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago (38 children) I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (37 children) Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them. It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments load more comments (37 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (42 children) The problem there is getting the initial seed funding. Investors put money into companies because they want to have control over the company, and they can't do that with a cooperative. There is a systemic bias towards capitalist company structure because of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 42 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (41 children) Investors want to make money above all. You can issue bonds with favorable interest rates as long as you have a solid business. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 41 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (40 children) The reality clearly demonstrates that investors don't bother investing in coops. You've obviously never actually tried to get investors to invest in a coop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 40 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (39 children) No I haven't. But I expect that the search for people who want to participate in an expanding cooperative is the bigger problem. Do you know of a cooperative that wants to issue bonds? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 39 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago (38 children) I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (37 children) Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them. It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments load more comments (37 replies)
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (41 children) Investors want to make money above all. You can issue bonds with favorable interest rates as long as you have a solid business. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 41 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (40 children) The reality clearly demonstrates that investors don't bother investing in coops. You've obviously never actually tried to get investors to invest in a coop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 40 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (39 children) No I haven't. But I expect that the search for people who want to participate in an expanding cooperative is the bigger problem. Do you know of a cooperative that wants to issue bonds? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 39 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago (38 children) I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (37 children) Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them. It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments load more comments (37 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -3 points 2 years ago (40 children) The reality clearly demonstrates that investors don't bother investing in coops. You've obviously never actually tried to get investors to invest in a coop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 40 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (39 children) No I haven't. But I expect that the search for people who want to participate in an expanding cooperative is the bigger problem. Do you know of a cooperative that wants to issue bonds? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 39 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago (38 children) I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (37 children) Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them. It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments load more comments (37 replies)
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (39 children) No I haven't. But I expect that the search for people who want to participate in an expanding cooperative is the bigger problem. Do you know of a cooperative that wants to issue bonds? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 39 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago (38 children) I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (37 children) Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them. It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments load more comments (37 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -4 points 2 years ago (38 children) I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (37 children) Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them. It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments load more comments (37 replies)
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (37 children) Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them. It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments load more comments (37 replies)
[–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) No ofense but... LoL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Laugh while you can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Ok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Laugh while you can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Ok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Ok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (6 children) Anarchist government, preferably communist in nature but mutualist works too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Plenty if you study history and anthropology. How do you think humans lived for millenia before the invention of currency? You do realize thousands of years separate that from advent of trade and long after we settled down to form permanent communities? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Nonsense. There is no returning to small-scale egalitarian societies. Large-scale societies are a trap; once you embrace them, you can never go back apart from in extreme isolation. Spend even 5 minutes thinking seriously about it and you will see why it's a pipe dream. permalink fedilink source parent [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) You think there is no authority in anarchist government? Have you ever read about horizontal-democracies? Anarchist just means "against coercive authorities" namely "centralized and hierarchical governance" You realize the fediverse that creates lemmy is an anarchist structure right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Plenty if you study history and anthropology. How do you think humans lived for millenia before the invention of currency? You do realize thousands of years separate that from advent of trade and long after we settled down to form permanent communities? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Nonsense. There is no returning to small-scale egalitarian societies. Large-scale societies are a trap; once you embrace them, you can never go back apart from in extreme isolation. Spend even 5 minutes thinking seriously about it and you will see why it's a pipe dream. permalink fedilink source parent [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) You think there is no authority in anarchist government? Have you ever read about horizontal-democracies? Anarchist just means "against coercive authorities" namely "centralized and hierarchical governance" You realize the fediverse that creates lemmy is an anarchist structure right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Plenty if you study history and anthropology. How do you think humans lived for millenia before the invention of currency? You do realize thousands of years separate that from advent of trade and long after we settled down to form permanent communities? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Nonsense. There is no returning to small-scale egalitarian societies. Large-scale societies are a trap; once you embrace them, you can never go back apart from in extreme isolation. Spend even 5 minutes thinking seriously about it and you will see why it's a pipe dream. permalink fedilink source parent [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) You think there is no authority in anarchist government? Have you ever read about horizontal-democracies? Anarchist just means "against coercive authorities" namely "centralized and hierarchical governance" You realize the fediverse that creates lemmy is an anarchist structure right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Nonsense. There is no returning to small-scale egalitarian societies. Large-scale societies are a trap; once you embrace them, you can never go back apart from in extreme isolation. Spend even 5 minutes thinking seriously about it and you will see why it's a pipe dream. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) You think there is no authority in anarchist government? Have you ever read about horizontal-democracies? Anarchist just means "against coercive authorities" namely "centralized and hierarchical governance" You realize the fediverse that creates lemmy is an anarchist structure right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) You think there is no authority in anarchist government? Have you ever read about horizontal-democracies? Anarchist just means "against coercive authorities" namely "centralized and hierarchical governance" You realize the fediverse that creates lemmy is an anarchist structure right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent