Clear as mud, where the timeline thing is concerned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Especially in a SF context where they’re not being clear if “timeline” means “somewhere else on the established timeline” or “a new alternate one”.

Unfortunately, I think that ship hath sailed. The word is used to mean both things fairly interchangeably, by fans and professionals alike.

In this context, I'm pretty comfortable assuming that they're looking at a new era within the regular ol' Prime Universe.

Bookmark this now so you can make fun of me later!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Actually I completely agree with your assumption. It's just the way they can't seem to express themselves clearly about it that's getting under my skin. And if they just would do that, it might slow down the billion clickbait "Paramount is rebooting Star Trek" stories out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I do wonder if they're dancing around NDAs and junk like that, too - writers really don't like to talk about stuff in the early stages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment