you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I find this deeply unethical.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    You shouldn't. It's just a neural net shaped like a fly brain. There's no biochemistry simulation past that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Eventually we can reduce the human brain down to this. Is it ethical to use that blueprint for experiments? We’ve got to be better than this, I hope. And it has to start before we get there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago

    No, we can't. The biochemistry needs to be there. The fly brain is a discretized abstract model of the fly brain with none of the weights it would need to be an actual (discretized abstract) model.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago*

    whatever simulation its in, it would be the only "reality" it knows. With no knowledge of anything else its in best reality it "knows" of, provided its even possible to have anything else going on beyond actions made by computer that are based on some nebulous ruleset that the fruitfly brain runs on.

  • source
  • parent