you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

I am explaining how the law works and the assumptions behind it. The law assumes that if you were embarrassed about your dick pics, that you would delete those before the officer is right about to search you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    The laws assumptions are bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    This guy has no fucking idea how the law works. Destruction of evidence requires a primary crime, the one you're destroying the evidence for. There is no crime, therefore no destruction of evidence. Only an incompetent or corrupt judge would let this even go to trial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments