you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

My understanding is that, for the purposes of inspections during border crossings, that is not the case. Also, remember that the border agent can decide, for pretty nuch any reason, that you're not getting on the flight, and, I'm sure, can add a note to your record to suggest to agents on other flights that they stop you too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    US citizens have an unequivocal right to re-enter the county regardless of where they have been, how they returned, how long they were gone, or what they were doing. This was already determined by the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    I admit, I didn't check, but if he was stopped on returning, then yes, he must be allowed in. He'd then be arrested.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    The other two issues are that he was allegedly repeatedly denied access to a lawyer when asked and not read his Miranda rights. Given how border patrol has acted lately, this is incredibly plausible and will hopefully lead to the motion to throw out the case being granted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    US citizens have an unequivocal right to enter the country, eventually, just not necessarily on a flight they booked (or any flight in the next few weeks, until the goons are done with them....)

  • source
  • parent