▲ 622 ▼ GrapheneOS duress PIN could land a man in prison (www.androidauthority.com) submitted 4 weeks ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 273 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) Then they will just deny you entry into the country permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] BillyClark@piefed.social 42 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) The guy from the article was referred to as "a US man," so I'm assuming he has US citizenship. The border cannot legally deny US citizens from entering the US. But they can do all sorts of other things, like detain or delay or prosecute people for not complying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 26 points 4 weeks ago Unless they're going to see real repercussions for doing so, get definitely can do whatever they want. Rules and laws only matter if people care enough to follow them and enforce them. All they have to do is pretend the person didn't comply, and now they've got all the authority in the world to anything they want, regardless of what it says in the law books. Just look at what ICE is doing to US citizens; border patrol knows they can do all of that, too. permalink fedilink source parent [–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) He's a US Citizen. Legally they cannot deny him entry into the country. Central to these protections is the absolute right of a U.S. citizen to return to their country. This right is unequivocal. No matter where an individual has traveled, the duration of their absence, or their personal or legal background, a U.S. citizen cannot be denied entry into the United States. This principle is supported by both statutory and constitutional law. A landmark Supreme Court case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), established that citizenship includes the right to reenter the nation. Unlike lawful permanent residents or visa holders, U.S. citizens are exempt from admissibility criteria. Consequently, even if a U.S. citizen lacks proper documentation or is subject to further questioning, the government is obligated to permit their entry once their citizenship is verified. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 8 points 4 weeks ago Trump Administration: "No" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 42 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) The guy from the article was referred to as "a US man," so I'm assuming he has US citizenship. The border cannot legally deny US citizens from entering the US. But they can do all sorts of other things, like detain or delay or prosecute people for not complying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 26 points 4 weeks ago Unless they're going to see real repercussions for doing so, get definitely can do whatever they want. Rules and laws only matter if people care enough to follow them and enforce them. All they have to do is pretend the person didn't comply, and now they've got all the authority in the world to anything they want, regardless of what it says in the law books. Just look at what ICE is doing to US citizens; border patrol knows they can do all of that, too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 26 points 4 weeks ago Unless they're going to see real repercussions for doing so, get definitely can do whatever they want. Rules and laws only matter if people care enough to follow them and enforce them. All they have to do is pretend the person didn't comply, and now they've got all the authority in the world to anything they want, regardless of what it says in the law books. Just look at what ICE is doing to US citizens; border patrol knows they can do all of that, too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) He's a US Citizen. Legally they cannot deny him entry into the country. Central to these protections is the absolute right of a U.S. citizen to return to their country. This right is unequivocal. No matter where an individual has traveled, the duration of their absence, or their personal or legal background, a U.S. citizen cannot be denied entry into the United States. This principle is supported by both statutory and constitutional law. A landmark Supreme Court case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), established that citizenship includes the right to reenter the nation. Unlike lawful permanent residents or visa holders, U.S. citizens are exempt from admissibility criteria. Consequently, even if a U.S. citizen lacks proper documentation or is subject to further questioning, the government is obligated to permit their entry once their citizenship is verified. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 8 points 4 weeks ago Trump Administration: "No" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 8 points 4 weeks ago Trump Administration: "No" permalink fedilink source parent