341
Inside the AI Porn Marketplace Where Everything and Everyone Is for Sale (www.404media.co)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
288 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Each of these reads like an extremely horny and angry man yelling their basest desires at Pornhub’s search function.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

As a programmer, I gotta say, that's probably not technically feasible in a sensible way.

Every camera has got to have an embedded key, and if any one of them leaks, the system becomes worthless.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    No, that would actually be feasible with enough effort.

    The real question is what do you do if someone takes a screenshot of that image? Since the picture must be in a format that can be shown, nothing is stopping people from writing software that just strips the authentication from the camera file.

    Edit: misread the problem. You need to get a private key to make forgeries and be able to say "no look, this was taken with a camera". Stripping the signature from photographs is the opposite of what we want here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    The point is, without the signature then there’s plausible deniability that it wasn’t real. If you want to prove something happened, then it should have a signature and be validated.

    If someone is showing off a screenshot of an image then in the future (now really) one probably needs to assume it’s fake unless there’s some overriding proof otherwise.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent