▲ 598 ▼ Unless users take action, Android will let Gemini access third-party apps (arstechnica.com) submitted 1 year ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 105 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like they're intentionally setting the barriers to entry too high for anyone other than Google... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Mainly just that one mean it will never be available on any other hardware... All the others seem like nice to haves rather than requirements to me(the first one is half required , half nice to have "...including full hardware security functionality"), but I guess I might change my mind when I get around to building a Linux phone when I have time to do that when I'm dead... 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like they're intentionally setting the barriers to entry too high for anyone other than Google... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Mainly just that one mean it will never be available on any other hardware... All the others seem like nice to haves rather than requirements to me(the first one is half required , half nice to have "...including full hardware security functionality"), but I guess I might change my mind when I get around to building a Linux phone when I have time to do that when I'm dead... 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Mainly just that one mean it will never be available on any other hardware... All the others seem like nice to haves rather than requirements to me(the first one is half required , half nice to have "...including full hardware security functionality"), but I guess I might change my mind when I get around to building a Linux phone when I have time to do that when I'm dead... 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Mainly just that one mean it will never be available on any other hardware... All the others seem like nice to haves rather than requirements to me(the first one is half required , half nice to have "...including full hardware security functionality"), but I guess I might change my mind when I get around to building a Linux phone when I have time to do that when I'm dead... 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent