β² 1518 βΌ pro tip (lemm.ee) submitted 2 years ago by abobla@lemm.ee to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world 115 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Alias albert=apt please albert-get update Edit: oops sorry didn't mean to reply to your comment, I'm on mobile so I thought was new comment permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Masta_Chief@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago How dare you. Straight to Lemmy jail! permalink fedilink source parent [β] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's please albert update nowadays. Why is apt-get still around? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] knolord@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago apt on its own isn't safe to use in shell scripts while apt-get is. At least, that is the output I get when using apt in a script on Debian. That is the only reason, for interactive sessions use apt, for automated scripts apt-get. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Masta_Chief@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago How dare you. Straight to Lemmy jail! permalink fedilink source parent
[β] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's please albert update nowadays. Why is apt-get still around? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] knolord@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago apt on its own isn't safe to use in shell scripts while apt-get is. At least, that is the output I get when using apt in a script on Debian. That is the only reason, for interactive sessions use apt, for automated scripts apt-get. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] knolord@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago apt on its own isn't safe to use in shell scripts while apt-get is. At least, that is the output I get when using apt in a script on Debian. That is the only reason, for interactive sessions use apt, for automated scripts apt-get. permalink fedilink source parent
