▲ 686 ▼ FCC chair wants to boost broadband standard to 100Mbps (www.theregister.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 108 comments fedilink hide all child comments FCC chair wants to boost broadband standard to 100Mbps::First refresh of minimums in eight years for the country that invented the internet
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 3 years ago (6 children) I pay the equivalent of $64 for 1 gigabit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FailBait@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (4 children) American internet isn’t all crap. I pay about $70 for Gigabit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cheems@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (3 children) You must live in a large city or near one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) You can get business gigabit for $90 a month where I live. Funny thing is that is the rural option, in town I have to go with Comcast and pay $160 a month for half a gigabit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Scrolled too far down before a mention of Comcast. I was in charge of a handful of locations where we needed broadband. They were geographically diverse enough that we had to go with different options. Comcast was the most expensive, and by a lot. Like 30%, and the slowest in dl/ul by a large margin. Comcast was also the second worst one to deal with. The actual worst one was the faster, slightly less expensive Spectrum. They had by far the worst service. A couple of locations had small DSL companies that were a delight to deal with and reasonably priced, but slow as balls. And then one location had a municipal fiber option that was the cheapest, fastest, and easiest to deal with by far. Like, I swear to god I could call them and talk to a real network engineer that no joke actually knew more than I did. I don't mean this to sound arrogant; I am not great with networking. I'm just saying compared to "yeah, I have that in bridge mode because I don't need router capability I'm running my own" and being answered with something like "whoa I'm going to need to get a supervisor" vs them being like "hey can you open a terminal and..." Yes, yes I can open a terminal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Oh no, Comcast is a terrible fucking company, we agree there. Its just that in the city, it is either them, or ATT with literally a DSL connection. Coax, or DSL, that's your options lmao. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Psythik@monyet.cc 1 point 3 years ago You pay $4 more than I do for the same thing (with no bandwidth cap). If you're not out in the sticks, internet is fine here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FailBait@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (4 children) American internet isn’t all crap. I pay about $70 for Gigabit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cheems@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (3 children) You must live in a large city or near one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) You can get business gigabit for $90 a month where I live. Funny thing is that is the rural option, in town I have to go with Comcast and pay $160 a month for half a gigabit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Scrolled too far down before a mention of Comcast. I was in charge of a handful of locations where we needed broadband. They were geographically diverse enough that we had to go with different options. Comcast was the most expensive, and by a lot. Like 30%, and the slowest in dl/ul by a large margin. Comcast was also the second worst one to deal with. The actual worst one was the faster, slightly less expensive Spectrum. They had by far the worst service. A couple of locations had small DSL companies that were a delight to deal with and reasonably priced, but slow as balls. And then one location had a municipal fiber option that was the cheapest, fastest, and easiest to deal with by far. Like, I swear to god I could call them and talk to a real network engineer that no joke actually knew more than I did. I don't mean this to sound arrogant; I am not great with networking. I'm just saying compared to "yeah, I have that in bridge mode because I don't need router capability I'm running my own" and being answered with something like "whoa I'm going to need to get a supervisor" vs them being like "hey can you open a terminal and..." Yes, yes I can open a terminal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Oh no, Comcast is a terrible fucking company, we agree there. Its just that in the city, it is either them, or ATT with literally a DSL connection. Coax, or DSL, that's your options lmao. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (3 children) You must live in a large city or near one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) You can get business gigabit for $90 a month where I live. Funny thing is that is the rural option, in town I have to go with Comcast and pay $160 a month for half a gigabit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Scrolled too far down before a mention of Comcast. I was in charge of a handful of locations where we needed broadband. They were geographically diverse enough that we had to go with different options. Comcast was the most expensive, and by a lot. Like 30%, and the slowest in dl/ul by a large margin. Comcast was also the second worst one to deal with. The actual worst one was the faster, slightly less expensive Spectrum. They had by far the worst service. A couple of locations had small DSL companies that were a delight to deal with and reasonably priced, but slow as balls. And then one location had a municipal fiber option that was the cheapest, fastest, and easiest to deal with by far. Like, I swear to god I could call them and talk to a real network engineer that no joke actually knew more than I did. I don't mean this to sound arrogant; I am not great with networking. I'm just saying compared to "yeah, I have that in bridge mode because I don't need router capability I'm running my own" and being answered with something like "whoa I'm going to need to get a supervisor" vs them being like "hey can you open a terminal and..." Yes, yes I can open a terminal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Oh no, Comcast is a terrible fucking company, we agree there. Its just that in the city, it is either them, or ATT with literally a DSL connection. Coax, or DSL, that's your options lmao. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) You can get business gigabit for $90 a month where I live. Funny thing is that is the rural option, in town I have to go with Comcast and pay $160 a month for half a gigabit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Scrolled too far down before a mention of Comcast. I was in charge of a handful of locations where we needed broadband. They were geographically diverse enough that we had to go with different options. Comcast was the most expensive, and by a lot. Like 30%, and the slowest in dl/ul by a large margin. Comcast was also the second worst one to deal with. The actual worst one was the faster, slightly less expensive Spectrum. They had by far the worst service. A couple of locations had small DSL companies that were a delight to deal with and reasonably priced, but slow as balls. And then one location had a municipal fiber option that was the cheapest, fastest, and easiest to deal with by far. Like, I swear to god I could call them and talk to a real network engineer that no joke actually knew more than I did. I don't mean this to sound arrogant; I am not great with networking. I'm just saying compared to "yeah, I have that in bridge mode because I don't need router capability I'm running my own" and being answered with something like "whoa I'm going to need to get a supervisor" vs them being like "hey can you open a terminal and..." Yes, yes I can open a terminal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Oh no, Comcast is a terrible fucking company, we agree there. Its just that in the city, it is either them, or ATT with literally a DSL connection. Coax, or DSL, that's your options lmao. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Scrolled too far down before a mention of Comcast. I was in charge of a handful of locations where we needed broadband. They were geographically diverse enough that we had to go with different options. Comcast was the most expensive, and by a lot. Like 30%, and the slowest in dl/ul by a large margin. Comcast was also the second worst one to deal with. The actual worst one was the faster, slightly less expensive Spectrum. They had by far the worst service. A couple of locations had small DSL companies that were a delight to deal with and reasonably priced, but slow as balls. And then one location had a municipal fiber option that was the cheapest, fastest, and easiest to deal with by far. Like, I swear to god I could call them and talk to a real network engineer that no joke actually knew more than I did. I don't mean this to sound arrogant; I am not great with networking. I'm just saying compared to "yeah, I have that in bridge mode because I don't need router capability I'm running my own" and being answered with something like "whoa I'm going to need to get a supervisor" vs them being like "hey can you open a terminal and..." Yes, yes I can open a terminal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Oh no, Comcast is a terrible fucking company, we agree there. Its just that in the city, it is either them, or ATT with literally a DSL connection. Coax, or DSL, that's your options lmao. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Oh no, Comcast is a terrible fucking company, we agree there. Its just that in the city, it is either them, or ATT with literally a DSL connection. Coax, or DSL, that's your options lmao. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Psythik@monyet.cc 1 point 3 years ago You pay $4 more than I do for the same thing (with no bandwidth cap). If you're not out in the sticks, internet is fine here. permalink fedilink source parent