666
Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds. Researchers found wild fluctuations—called drift—in the technology’s abi... (fortune.com)
submitted 3 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
150 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds. Researchers found wild fluctuations—called drift—in the technology’s abi...::ChatGPT went from answering a simple math correctly 98% of the time to just 2%, over the course of a few months.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 49 points 3 years ago (2 children)

It was initially presented as the all-problem-solver, mainly by the media. And tbf, it was decently competent in certain fields.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    Problem was it was presented as problem solved which it never was, it was problem solution presenter. It can't come up with a solution, only come up with something that looks like a solution based on what input data had. Ask it to invert sort something and goes nuts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    Once AGI is achieved and subsequently Sentient-super intelligent ai- I cant imagine them not being such a thing, however I'd be surprised if a super intelligent sentient ai doesn't decide humanity needs to go extinct for its own best self interests.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent