Hmmh. Good reminder not to rely on these cloud services too much. And I mean the terms and services are kinda vague and enforced by a (rogue) AI. She could have stored murder mystery stories to the same effect.
Hab diese Diskussion nicht so wirklich verfolgt. Ich finde man sollte der Ukraine was auch immer sie wollen liefern um ihr Land effektiv zu verteidigen. Fände es andersherum auch nett Hilfe zu bekommen wenn ich angegriffen würde. Ich verstehe die Diskussion sowieso nicht so ganz. Ist ja jetzt nicht so als würden die regelmäßig Scheiße bauen mit dem was wir als Unterstützung liefern, oder das an Unterdrücker-Regimes weiterverkaufen würden oder so...
Gut, so die Gesamtheit verstehe ich schon... Wir haben Angst vor Putin und überlegen uns ob wir unseren potenziellen Freunden helfen sollen, oder sie lieber vor die Hunde gehen lassen, damit er vielleicht lieb zu uns ist. Ich denke aber eher das das Gegenteil eintreten wird.
Ich denke ich würde unserer Bundeswehr das nächste Sondervermögen streichen, wenn sie offensichtlich nicht mit Geld umgehen können, die nächsten 100 Milliarden an die Ukraine geben, dafür können die sich ein paar schicke Marschflugkörper, Raketen und Kampfjets bei uns kaufen. Und im Gegenzug erledigen die zum Gemeinwohl Aller das Problem mit Putins Kriegslust. Ich denke das wäre eine Win-Win-Situation. Und unsere Rüstungsindustrie freut das bestimmt auch.
Ich finde es sowieso nicht gut, dass wir alles so scheibchenweise rausrücken, immer gerade zu wenig, so dass sich der Krieg immer weiterzieht. Vielleicht sollten wir uns mal entscheiden ob wir jetzt effektiv helfen wollen oder nicht. Damit das irgendwann auch mal ein Ende haben kann, ich meine dort sterben ja täglich Menschen...
The missing graphics acceleration is annoying. It is really sluggish and not fun to use.
Gitlab.com just started doing shady stuff and requiring phone numbers or something on sign-up if what I read a few days ago here, is correct. For self-hosting the software should still be alright.
Github.com is by Microsoft and not free software. I don't know what direction Microsoft is taking with it, but it is widely adopted and they give you free CI and other stuff.
Codeberg, Sourcehut etc should be fine. I haven't heard negative things about them.
"Best" is running my own Forgejo on my server. At least that's what I think. But I also keep things on github, since all the people are there.
The problem with that is a few years is a bit short to get real benefits out of it. And the Wikipedia article contradicts the statement that productivity went down. Actually issues and errors went down, half the workforce was alright with it and they saved tens of millions of Euros. And then they cancelled it. That decision wasn't backed by technical or factual reasons at all. Many people said they were fine with Linux. Issues were for example that they had old and outdated computers. As a reason to switch back they claimed: sync to mobile phones had issues (...as if government workforce syncs their calendar to their mobile phones...) and these were issues with the groupware suite. Nothing had anything to do with Linux, productivity or the people who sat in front of the computers and actually had to use it. There were quite some benefits and from the technical side things were going well despite admins not being backed by their superiors and the city. They did a final study which contains quite some / mostly dubious statements, and Microsoft also was involved in the switching back.
You CAN enforce a change. Sure, change is always hard in the beginning. But we do it all the time. The story of LiMux is more: You can destroy anything if you really want to. And politics likes to twist things so it suites their narrative. (And lobbyism is a thing and Microsoft is better at it than the Linux community.)
Yeah, the short version is: Fascism is what's wrong with Hungary.
I would say so, considering I write English here and speak German the rest of the day...
Edit: Alright, I've scrolled down and I'm not the first making that joke.
I answered there. Not sure why you open a completely new post for that follow-up question?! You could have asked just here.
We need a proper leftist party we can vote instead.
Because you're biasing the diagram by deliberately excluding data. You could have excluded the best. Or the worst. Or some in between so two look close together but aren't. Or it could look more uniform than it really is. Excluding data and not being transparent and upfront with is, is skewing things.
rufus
0 post score0 comment score
Why does it force the processor over the limit in the first place?
I think in every other laptop the CPU just throttles when it gets too hot. Meaning it can never exceed the maximum temperature. I wonder if this is a misunderstanding or if HP actually did away with all of that and designed a laptop that will cook itself.
And it's not even a good design decision to shutdown the PC if someone runs a game... Aren't computers meant to run them? Why not automatically lower the framerate by throttling? Why shut down instead?