this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
67 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3631 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The topic of gas stoves ignited a heated debate last year when a Biden appointee suggested they could be banned because they posed a risk to human health.

But a ban isn’t in the works — and this week the administration will finalize a scaled-back plan to make new stoves less energy-intensive.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Saving consumers money and having them breathe healthier air is just part of the liberal woke mind virus.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

It's my freedom to suck on tailpipes and stove exhaust. Those damn libruls better not take that right away from me!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I like coil top stoves, and hate computers in bedded in stoves.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Some conservative ghoul, like Clarence Thomas:

This is why the administrative state needs to go.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Wow my uh, preview image is rather explicit. I don’t even surf pork on Lemmy, the hell?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Lemmy and the Washington Post tend to interact really badly. It's an ongoing problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I read an article about stove top gas regulations for nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I recommend cooking breakfast the morning after.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Jesus Christ hahaha glad I wasn't browsing at work!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Same. I am aware that KBin has some occasional issues with wrong thumbnails, but this one is absolutely hilarious.

@ernest ?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

For the folks getting the thumbnail from MILFtrip.com because of "awesome kbin image caching bug". NO, that is not how the DoE is poised. That position is not of modest efficiency. And I highly doubt that would save consumers money on energy bills.

There are zero ways that anything with a MILF is "less energy-intensive".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A few years ago, my electric bill jumped from about $100/month to over $350. I called the local utilities commission and they told me that they could come out and do a "survey" of my appliances but if their guy determined that the bill was my fault, I'd have to pay $100 as a "service call."

The guy essentially walked into my house and just pointed at every appliance and said what it was, told me that my refrigerator was the culprit, then handed me a bill for $100.

This utilities commission is still adding $20 a month to people's electric bill for a "solar research" charge and they've not made a single investment into solar in the 20 years that they started adding that fee. They still burn diesel to generate power.

Edit: My point is, electricity could certainly be less of an expense, but because it's treated as a commodity instead of a necessity, power companies know they can price gauge.