chugging microplastics instead of getting a vasectomy
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
87 points (100.0% liked)
Science
22875 readers
119 users here now
Welcome to Hexbear's science community!
Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events
No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Wasn’t this a result of a change in measurement technique, and these articles are just comparing the two datasets as if they’re direct equivalents? I remember seeing an explainer about this like a year ago.
"THIS IS BECAUSE OF WOKE!"
They unironically believe this
It’s the globohomo! The DEI department of Dow Chemical has been running things behind the scenes this whole time and now white men can’t come!
yeah, good
CONSERVE
YOUR
FLUIDS
less westoids?
less protein.
People with a breeding kink in shambles rn
so fucking cursed why am I posting this
Is sperm the part of semen that has the protein, if it does?? Is it just weird nothing goo nutritionally otherwise?
The part without the sperm is called seminal plasma, and its contents are the following (just remove the testes' contribution since that's what provides the sperm):
So it does have quite alot of nutrition even without the sperm, most notably protein (even without sperm), vitamin C, and sugars
Also this is a thing apparently
Real
And so long as it came from a willing partner, it's also vegan.
Now this is the type of posting I log into hexbear for
Wow, sure is good to see someone work out their pseudoscientific misogyny kink on NATOpedia.
nutritionally 😭😭😭😭
Part of a balanced diet, natch.
Let's get that to 100%, no more cum
Damn shrinkflation.
I've always wanted to live Children of Men....
the US desperately needs a Department of Semen Retrieval
Those are rookie numbers! We need to get those numbers even lower!
I don't think whoever came on that banana is part of the problem.
More like Mission Nocumplished
Smh cumageddon
the west has fallen
I'm doing my part! 
Oh I love you all so much. I read the title, saw 33 comments and my first thought was "shit, someone's probably being weird in the comments, talking about how actually, for real, this is an important problem (it isn't)". Then I get in here and it's all jokes, except for one possible debunking of the article.
Thanks for brightening my day by not buying into "muh birthrates!!1!!!" nonsense!
I wonder if it tastes the same.
Carlos Mencia touched the lathe of heaven