this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
2168 points (98.0% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2846 readers
834 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Did they actually cut it off? (Even if temporarily?)

[–] AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 91 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, I am not doubting that this happened, because in the mix of callousness and incompetence on display, it isn't unlikely. But a source would be much appreciated, still.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 63 points 1 week ago

Here's a Snopes review of what I think is the same specific topic.

It mentions nothing about these being orphan support payments, but rather, these being possibly incorrectly typed SSNs that resulted in their recordkeeping systems assuming, based on the information tied to those SSNs, that the borrowers were, say, 11 years old, when in actuality they were not, and the SSNs had just been inputted incorrectly, even if all other borrower information was accurate.

They also didn't stop these funds, as they were already given out. They're simply "reviewing" them.

[–] marduk@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We don't need sources, we just go off vibes

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they tell a thousand lies in the time it takes to fact check one. We tell one lie, and suddenly every complaint we've ever held against them is invalidated because we're liars.

I think it's obvious how absurd this is.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t think I’ve ever seen this said better. I’ll be quoting you.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wish i could take credit for it, stole the quote from a reddit comment from a few years ago. I'm sure the guy i stole it from stole it from someone else.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

That’s cool. I’ll re-gift it, then. Thanks!