456
'Ate Seagulls
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
456 points (93.5% liked)
okmatewanker
1365 readers
1 users here now
No foul language - i.e. French 🤮
Obviously satire, dozy wankers
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
As if you wouldn't steal a £30 pound steak if it had zero consequences and no morals attached, besides that I don't think anything deserves to be abused before getting killed and especially not in public with children watching.
So you're saying he should had been more effective in killing the seagull in front of the kids
He just shouldn't have done it, but obviously yes that too.
Obviously a waste of good avian meat
And yet, here there were consequences.
It's just a specific breeding programme and he was culling the failures. #evolution \s
Exactly, he's helping nature
I don't see where it says he abused the bird before killing it.
exactly, the swing probably was to get enough speed
Pretty sure it dying instantly in a quick whack is the opposite of being abused
Like no he shouldn't have done that but you're going a little overboard