froztbyte

wut

The line I've seen on AI boils down to this. AI won't meet human economic potential. But it will run cheaper

citation needed

arguing-from-existence of expert systems (which were the fantasy in the previous wave)

you probably don’t know this, but this post is so much funnier than you probably meant it

and it (probably) still won’t save you

alert alert we've got of one of them on the doorstep

my heuristic: I can understand a shitty past giving crescent to bad reactions, but the moment you start choosing bad things with current-era things I rapidly start losing grace and patience

(and yeah I know there's a continuum of stuff between A and B, but anyone showing up in a fucking news article of this shape is generally well past accident)

holy hell that inner is all kinds of past-even-wrong

is there some kind of idiocy gdq rankweekend event that I missed the announcement for?

yeah, but like .... yeah? this is a thing someone put together from the spectrum of existing parts, to show the viability, and pitch as a kit because it's neat

pretty obviously any commercial version of it would have to be more buttoned up. that's literally in the product design loop

can't tell if you were joking or are unfamiliar with what a turing machine is

I heard it was the same 50 parties, over and over

(or, well, the same party, x50...)

all hail the hockey stick may we forever outspend all competition and reap the rewards of a ravaged market we solely control

also series potential in there

Surprisingly (not), a sexbot!