anthromusicnote

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Wow, thanks, I didn't know about that one so I didn't even include it in my post so you stop saying it!

That's not a solution. That's a workaround for another workaround. If we want to make Lemmy become a useful resource, communities need to grow. And there is no better way to promote content besides posting it on other relevant spaces. I don't run a shitposting space, it's educational content and I post stuff once in 3-5 days, so I'm not spamming anything. If you have an alternative method for growing a community, I'll hear it out.

 

I've noticed that some users block other users and communities when they see several posts appear multiple time in the feed. It kinda sucks, because I x-post to 3 communities on 3 different instances to have some more reach and redundancy. Unfortunately it means that users otherwise interested in my content filter me or my communities out because it clutters their feed. It also means that other people posting in the same community are losing audiences. And the platform grows slower as a result. Everyone loses.

The often proposed (and inefficient) solution is to post to just one instance and one community, but that brings its own set of problems with opening content from other instances being wonky, server outages, bugs and potential for an instance to go down for a long of period of time or permanently due to various reasons. Not feeling particularly excited about piecing it all back together from the fediverse.

Anyways, I think if users keep blocking whole communities or subscribe to only one version of it just because of crossposts wreaking havoc it will ultimately inhibit the platform's growth. This should be easily fixed by filtering out duplicate posts that are already properly x-posted from the feed, and I've checked GitHub but it feels like similar issues have already been created in different wording. So when is this functionality coming?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's true, I wasn't advocating for putting a combined plugin on everything for any other reason but workflow, the memory concern and effect additions are a really good point! That said, AFAIK SPAN shouldn't cause any effects and being an analyzer plugin you can always disable instances you don't need. MSED is a bit different, so no comment there. I use MSED and SPAN on pre-master channel buses so I can monitor groups of instruments and I really need all of the measurements in there to make some judgements and adding 5+ plugins to emulate their combined function will only add more surface for potential effect additions and clutter my screen. That's where I was coming from. Maybe I'm wrong about it, let me know

 

If you’ve listened to some 90s and early 00s ambient-oriented tracks and tried to recreate their sounds with just a synth, you’ll notice that downsampling and bitcrushing won’t get you the same kind of sound you hear in there. It will sound dull(er) and less… complete, lush, rich? That is because back in the day artists sampled their synths and the technical side of that process had some cool side effects.

You can sample in two different ways. You can sample whole chords, where your parallel harmonies and frequency stretching will combine into a weird but cool sound. Or, on the topic of this video, you can sample an individual note from a synth and have your frequency stretching happen with different magnitudes for every note of the chord. That will create an interesting and rich sound!

This Thought-Forms video will show you an exact how-to with some tips on how to develop that sampler sound once you get the basics. It’s quick, concise and really informative.

I hope you find this technique useful. AMN out!

cross-posted from: https://waveform.social/post/273815

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd argue the speed reduction to your workflow from having to manage multiple overlapping windows is a significant drawback and there is nothing that stops free software from embedding other projects as a dependency with some user discretion. Unless you don't have to manage the windows because of how much screen space you have or because of how those plugins work around that, I'd say having all essential stuff in one place (window) is better. I worked in FL for a long time and I'm not sure if it gets better in other DAWs. Trying out new stuff soon though

 

There are a lot of great stereo imaging tools and spectrum analyzers. Most of them aren't free though. Having a good way to visually analyze loudness, frequency distribution and stereo image is incredibly important. Unfortunately, it is often the case that most default or free solutions are barely functional. They don't provide you with enough information to shape your mix or don't present it in a simple, clear and understandable format. (I'm looking at you, FL studio visualizers!)

SPAN is a spectrum analysis tool that will let you monitor your peak volume, RMS and LUFS. It shows you the frequencies that are passing through the plugin and you can customize the spectrum view by changing time, frequency and level ranges. If you want even more precision and control, you can adjust the fast fourier transform sample size, it gets that technical! You can also compare channels, left and right of the same channel or two different ones. Two channel comparison is the limit of the free version, SPAN Plus allows you to display as many channels as your DAW will allow. It also features a correlation meter that measures your phase alignment (1=fully aligned and -1=completely misaligned). It can also track your loudness stats thoughout the playtime to iron out any kinks. Handy, functional and no-nonsense tool.

MSED is a stereo analysis and encoding tool. It can help you manange your side and mid channels: your stereo image. It comes with a basic set of tools that allows you to pan, change levels, swap left-right channels and flip phase 180 degrees. The visualizers are pretty simple, you have your correlation meter from before, stereo pan meter and plasma-style vector scope. You might think you don't need it if you DAW provides stereo imaging functions of its own, but often times you're going to be playing guessing games in terms of how that audio will actually get processed: some DAWS merge your stereo tracks to mono, some don't. MSED takes care of that ambiguity and puts all of the necessary tools and monitoring in one spot.

These plugins are available in VST, VST3, AU and AAX for free! I really can't recommend them enough if you're starting out producing or are in need of simple tools that won't take a toll on your CPU with fancy advanced processing.

SPAN Product page: https://www.voxengo.com/product/span/

MSED Product page: https://www.voxengo.com/product/msed/

cross-posted from: https://waveform.social/post/241390

 

Dubstep growls may sound like they’re simple, but getting a good growl sound is way more than just distorting some waves to all hell (though it may be a part of it). Using your envelopes and LFOs to shape the sound through filters, distortion and other effects will get quite a bit more complicated.

Noah will show us how to get a high quality, clean and powerful dubstep growl in the style of Virtual Riot, so you can put those skills and ideas to use in your own synth patches.

cross-posted from: https://waveform.social/post/154053

 

EQ is a really simple tool, but the way it works is anything but that. Different equalizers use different algorithms to process your audio, and most of them will affect your sound in unexpected ways.

The video will give you an overview on some technical reasons why phase weirdness happens with most EQs and also how an asymmetric EQ setup can give you unexpected Haas effects.

And man, does Sage Audio’s video feature some sick beats!

cross-posted from: https://waveform.social/post/136498

 

I was looking for some good videos on automation and it surprised me that there’s not a lot of content relating to the decision making process, despite automation being a standard feature in any modern production software.

Automation is an important tool in any music producers kit and learning how to use it well is just as important as arranging your tracks, if not slightly more so for electronic tracks. One could say that in electronic music it is a part of arranging.

There are a lot of fun ways to automate your productions, like creating macro effects for your synths to use as buildups or additional texture. Today though, we’ll take a look at how Fabio from Noize London approaches making transitions, building and releasing tension, and working with emotion through gain automation.

cross-posted from: https://waveform.social/post/129146

 

Mixing in mono is one of those production "tricks" that have solidified in my mixing routine to achieve clearer mixes. It's a really easy shortcut to hearing levels and even frequencies of everything in your track without the distraction of stereo imaging. It also helps to figure out phase issues between closely tuned kicks and bass and correct your synth sound design too!

But sometimes the immediate benefit it gives us gets outweighed by a longterm one of improving your critical hearing skills. For example, if you use mono to hear frequency fighting between instruments, you're undercutting your learning experience of properly working with frequencies in stereo. After all, it's not uncommon to pan different instruments asymmetrically. Having stereo means you have two different signals that should be shaped on their own terms.

Michael is going to walk us through some of the things that mixing in mono can be used for and give some perspective on how those particular uses stack up in a more robust or specific production workflow. And, I hope this knowledge helps you in your own productions!

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/742906

 

How do you mix lots of instruments? Do you balance them all out so you can hear every single one that's playing? Then this one is probably for you!

In this video, Gregory goes into why you should prioritize a couple of melodic instruments in a mix and also how to think about mixing with the listener in mind.

Personally, it's been very helpful for me to formalize what I was already feeling. Sometimes I make a track with a focus on a couple of instruments and sometimes I try to balance everything out. Whenever I balance I feel like the track becomes too overwhelming to listen to and I was tearing my head apart as to why it happens on certain tracks and not the others. Now I know why, and I hope this video helps you on your journey too!

cross-posted from: https://waveform.social/post/80742