this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
57 points (93.8% liked)

World News

38553 readers
2652 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ordered Israel on Friday to take action to prevent acts of genocide as it wages war against Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip but stopped short of calling for an immediate ceasefire.

The top United Nations court for handling disputes between states was ruling in a case brought by South Africa.

Here are key takeaways from the decision.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Reuters – Bias and Credibility

Bias Rating: Least Biased


Factual Reporting: Very High


Country: United Kingdom


MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: Mostly Free


Media Type: News Agency


Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic


MBFC Credibility Rating: High Credibility

About MediaBiasFactCheck.com

Methodology

Ad Fontes Media Alternative Rating

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I thought it was strange that this article limited their description of Israel's reaction, to only Ben Gvir saying "Hague Schmague". Multiple Israeli cabinet officials have accused The Hague of being anti-semetic since the ruling, which is much more serious than silly wordplay. Why would Reuters downplay the emotional responses to the decision?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the classic "you're anti-semetic if you're against genocide" defense.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Yeah, the Israeli government's response to the ICJ decision have been appalling.

Im not criticizing Reuters as a whole for leaving out defense minister Gallant's and security minister Ben-Gvir's comments, I just think it was a mistake to not include that in this article. The Israeli government is not just mocking the ICJ, they're delegitimizng it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Israel commiting an occupation of Palatine for over 80yrs, overtly commiting the genocide of non Jews. And we are still discussing the semantics. Earth filled with so many absolute morons.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I’m still learning about world politics…

ICJ asks for things and then… what happens? What’s the “or else” in an international court like this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Israel with the ad hominem defense "but it's antisemitic".

Bold