530
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For this comment, I want to be absolutely clear that I do not give a shit about AI, and that it in no way factored into my decision to buy this iPhone 16 Pro Max.

With that disclaimer out of the way:

I very much look forward to a class action lawsuit. Apple advertised specific features as coming ‘very soon’ and gave short timeframes when asked directly. And they basically did not deliver on those advertising promises. Basically, I think there’s a good case to be made here that Apple knowingly engaged in false advertising in order to sell a phone that otherwise would not have sold as well. Those promised AI features WERE a deciding factor for a lot of people to upgrade to an iPhone 16.

So, I’ll be looking forward to some form of compensation. It’s the principle of it.

[-] [email protected] 197 points 4 days ago

I really hope this goes somewhere.

Not because I have any sympathy for the shareholders, mind you, fuck absolutely everyone involved. But I think it would be very funny to make Apple prove in court that AI is such dogshit it would've hurt the product more to implement it than not.

[-] [email protected] 78 points 4 days ago

Meanwhile in my company the leadership just thinks that we have a messaging problem after the new AI stuff we implemented made absolutely no difference in the sales numbers.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 4 days ago

I mean you do have a messaging problem. Your leadership has received bad messaging about what "AI" can do!

[-] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

If they are anything like the leadership at my company they have received plenty of information about what AI can do from that IT, but you see they went to this convention in Las Vegas and some self-styled "business guru" told them everything they wanted to hear.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

I'm surprised they at least know they have a problem. I would think these companies would just say "look how the sales numbers haven't changed, that means that we were correct in doing the AI thing. Without it, sales would be sinking into the ocean!"

[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Advertise more and sell harder. Who cares what kind of trash the customers end up buying, because only profits matter.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 4 days ago

The overpromising is criminal despite what the actual law says. Let the companies pushing AI beyond it‘s boundaries bleed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Apple could have just...not gone for AI at all, they're now in an awkward spot where they know it would make their product worse to implement it, yet they promised anyways

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Siri still struggles with toggling my lights with voice commands, after nearly 8 years of tearful screaming at my HomePod.

I want to see 1 Infinite Loop transformed into a giant toilet.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Me: Siri turn lights on

Siri: Now playing Bon Jovi’s “Wanted dead or alive”

Me: Siri shut the fuck up, you have one job, do that job

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Even the home app struggles to turn on my lights and I don’t know if it’s Apple or the hue bridge loses connection.

[-] [email protected] 77 points 4 days ago

Apple used rigged demos and made false claims about their own technology so outstanding that their own project managers were taken aback by how far behind the features actually were vs. what was pushed. There's already informal documentaries on the massive internal disconnects within Apple that have lead to poor product testing and stagnation.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

There is some possibility that Tim Cook will resign or be fired.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

This can be a very good thing or a very bad thing.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

For this to be a good thing the shareholders would need to agree to a technical CEO rather than a marketing one and that comes with the wee lil' issue of raining on their AI parade. If Tim Cook goes his replacement will be even worse.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

As much as I dislike Steve Jobs personally, Apple needs someone at the helm who is product and customer experience oriented like he was. Obviously, technical know-how is good, but someone exclusively technical would flounder. Tim Cook is a supply chain guy. His replacement would almost certainly be someone marketing oriented, since innovation no longer drives Apple. Sales do.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 60 points 4 days ago

Instead of focusing on battery life, they focused on some dogshit hype product that no one uses and no body asked for.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago

Are you asleep? EVERYONE ASKED FOR AI IN ALL THE THINGS!

/s

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

THE SHARES! THEY NEED TO BE HELD! ONLY THE HOLDERS OF THE SHARES KNOW WHAT IS BEST!

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Apple professional management have run the company down with their many foolish decisions. Feels similar to how Microsoft became worse annd worse after XP.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 4 days ago

I'm pretty sure you can trace the management downturn of American companies back to a change in MBA curriculum.

You can see when they started getting hired after the shift. Where they were taught that as long as your department is doing well and has positive numbers, LITERALLY nothing else matters. The company could be crashing and burning around you, you might even be causing it, but as long as those numbers are going up, you'll quickly get hired at another company. Because every single iota of their education is about pleasing investors who only care about money now, and not potential money in a few years.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

They go on about long-term investment and then you find out that what they're actually talking about is things that will start returning a profit in 6 months. Half a year is long-term to them.

If you have a long-term view and want to make quite a lot of money you probably couldn't do better than shorting Apple stock. They never innovate anymore (every iPhone is literally the same as the previous years), and they spend huge amounts of money on failed projects (Vision Pro), meanwhile they continue not to fix ongoing serious issues (Safari).

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 43 points 4 days ago

I hope this is the beginning of the end for AI.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

What?! Haven't your heard?

  • FSD is happening next year, for sure,
  • we're still 18 months away from developers being replaced,
  • it's "deep" reasoning, basically nearly ASI!

/s (obviously)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 32 points 4 days ago

Let's face it the problem is mostly the people. If AI was as super duper as claimed to be it would be able to construct advertising that makes everyone go: 'Yeah, I have to have this, it's useful, ethical, the bees knees really. '

The little advertising that still makes it over my thresholds is bad to abominable and of that what registers for me has the opposite affect it intents - I go out of my way to avoid it.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Based shareholders

[-] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

Was Apple Intelligence a fiasco?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Have you seen the typical apple zealot?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

Have you seen the typical Linux zealot lol

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Have you seen a Windows zealot?

Yeah me neither

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

They exist. Go on a Steam discussions page for a popular game that doesn't currently support Linux, and create a new post politely asking about the possibility of Linux support.

*A wild WINDOWS ZEALOT appears*

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

As a FreeBSD zealot, I really don't see anything far from norm with Linux zealots. They are a bit conflict-seeking and ignorant, but that's ok.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

An apple has more intelligence.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

All the shareholders of AI progressing companies should do this.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Apple will be pissed at you now shareholders! Why would you do such a thing? sue them? really ? Apple is a good company, would never do that! /S

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I. Am. GeNiuS

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

I think Apple is going to have to release Safari for Windows and Linux to use new users as guinea pigs.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

I did use Safari for Windows back in the day. It was a product they indeed shipped.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
530 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

71995 readers
2937 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS