243
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Would you like some pie? Check it out here: https://piefed.ca/

What is PieFed

PieFed follows a similar format as Lemmy and Mbin. Those that are familiar with Lemmy will find it very similar, with some additional features including topic lists, optional private voting, new mod and admin tools, crosspost de-duplication, community wikis, etc. Thanks to how the fediverse works, you can use either lemmy.ca or piefed.ca to interact freely!

We will put together some guides on our non-profit's website at some point. In the meantime, we have created [email protected] for us to learn from each other. There is also the official [email protected] community which has a similar purpose.

We have done some testing and we are learning as we go, but please bear with us while this new platform gets going ๐Ÿ™‚

Other Links & FAQ

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It would be nice if they had ability to collapse comments.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The two diagonal arrows next to the vote arrows under a comment allows to collapse comments

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Awesome, is part of the motivation here to guard a bit against the unpopularity of the Lemmy devs / lemmy.ml?

I do somewhat feel like they've made people a bit more skeptical of the Lemmy name, PieFed might be an easier sell as a reddit alt.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Pics and memes look better on pied. Oh boy how many accounts am I going to have now?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Happy cake day!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I'm not quite sure what this is and why I should use this over Lemmy .... but I'd like to give it a try lol! Also very cool how the Fediverse allows for different entry points and view the same content.

Congrats on the expansion!

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

We're also learning as we go :) In addition to the features mentioned in the post, a big one for regional instances like ours might be the topic lists (once we set those up anyway)

Congrats on the expansion!

Thanks!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Whoa! This is really cool!

[-] [email protected] 47 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

Hola desde el mismo lugar de siempre. (Lemmy).

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Hello โœŒ๏ธ ๐Ÿ˜„

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Trying out PieFed after 2 years of Lemmy and it's looking more and more like Voyager has ended it's time on my phone

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Iโ€™m just happy we have another Canadian instance

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Well... It's the same management. It gives users another option for how to consume but it doesn't add a lot of diversity. No fault implied.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago

Stuff like this really helps reinforce why the fediverse is the best platform. Portability is no joke.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Thank you for your hard work :)

[-] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Mmmmmmmmmmm. Sugar Pie. My birthday treat!

[-] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

Pie flavor. I'm stoked that Piefed has Atkinson Hyperlegible as a font choice! It's my favorite font, especially for ereaders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Hello from the other side!

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Excellent work folks!

The true power of federation showing itself here. In this case, it's two software packages with the same server/admin team -- which basically future proofs both.

I'd make a recommendation: have some sort of cross-pollination tool. Basically, pull the database of all subscribed communities on Lemmy.ca and have a bot subscribe to the same on PieFed, and vice versa. Probably easy to do if you have server-side access.

Furthermore, in the ideal world, "Local" from the Lemmy instance includes the piefed.ca local commuities. This might be a harder ask. The reason would be to prevent bisecting the Local feeds.

Finally, ideally there is a community migration tool, to cross between Lemmy and PieFed if a community wants to move from one side to the other. This would be a bigger project, but would future proof Fedican even further should either piece of software become badly maintained.

Well, okay, I just created a year's worth of work for a programmer. How can I help?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, I noticed that the option "local" is pretty much empty on piefed.ca I wonder if we create the same communities there and group them together would work.

Here is their repo, https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/issues I imagine you can propose some of those ideas there.

I think one of the problems on migrating users right now is how lemmy stores password compared to piefed. https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/issues/712 - But technically, it should work if you ask the user to write a new password.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Is the API active? I want to use PieFed over Lemmy, but don't like to join so called "flagship instances", they always go overboard with moderation at some point.

So instead of joining piefed.social I signed up with .au, only to find out that the admin never bothered to activate the api, so can't use any apps, and posts aren't federating outwards properly.

Edit: Confirmed working, registration sent.

Edit 2: Approved within 5 min, thanks for that!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

The API is new I believe, piefed.social enabled it recently as well

https://piefed.social/post/817564

Welcome to piefed.ca :)

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I think it has been there for a bit, but was still in alpha. Preferred.social had it running for a while, that's their official test instance. But good to see it working!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Yep the API is on as of earlier today. It's not listed in the docs yet, which is probably why the au instance doesn't have it on.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Is the API similar to that of Lemmy's?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Very similar. I expect app devs will have an easy time of it.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nice. Already registered.

~~Is there a recommended android app for it?~~

I just saw the FAQ section after.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Does PieFed have an api yet that lets it work with Lemmy apps?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

There is an API but it is slightly different from Lemmy, and it's very new, which is why the app list is small. Right now that includes [email protected] and using the website as a PWA. As more people use it, more apps should implement support.

The PieFed dev docs say that the API is 95% similar, so hopefully it should be easy enough for app developers to implement

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Oh, Piefed has the ability to see threading and micro-blogging posts?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

You might be thinking of Mbin, the other one of the "big three" (more like big one and the other two). Mbin's biggest differentiating feature is microblog support. It's hard to boil PieFed down to one main feature compared to Lemmy/Mbin, but anonymous voting and de-duplication of reposts might be the main ones. However, its focus is still on the (Lemmy-style) threaded side of the fediverse.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

Example showing comments across reposts in 6 different communities.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Out of curiosity, can a community opt out of its comments being bundled with others?

After seeing it in action, I think that's actually a nifty feature that most communities and the threadiverse as a whole would benefit from, but I could also potentially foresee a minority of communities not wanting to increase their comments exposure to that degree.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Thinking a bit bigger - I'd like to see a 'private community' feature which limits the visibility of posts inside to community members only. With an optional approval process to join.

That would take care of the comment bundling issue too.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think there would still be a desire for the relative in-between setting of just opting out of the bundling. My reasoning is that a community may want to be open to be viewed and commented by anyone so that they continue to grow and have more participation, either by search or random encounter from the /all view, as that allows slow organic growth with relatively few people wanting to go in there and derail conversations.

With bundling, that community will be seen by far more non-members than ever before if a popular link is posted around to multiple communities, inviting a significant amount of outside participation, and the potential for a much increased need to keep things on topic, or to step in and moderate drama from other communities with wildly different perspectives.

Without the ability to opt out of bundling, this leaves only the two extremes of potentially unwanted isolation, or potentially unwanted increased outside participation.

The only other option would be for a community to request their admin defederate from the troublesome community, or from the outside instance entirely, which is using a mallet to solve something that could be done with scalpel.

I do think the bundling is quite nice overall, and I don't foresee a problem with it being the default, but I do strongly see the need for that middle ground option to opt-out, personally. The way Lemmy currently operates by default is effectively that middle-ground option that is missing from Piefed.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

the two extremes of potentially unwanted isolation, or potentially unwanted increased outside participation.

Yes that's a good way to put it. Thanks.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Cheers for hearing me out! :)

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Honestly, I think it's one of the most undercutting, least thought out features in piefed, that focuses entirely on the immediaye convenience of the end user over the health of the discussion groups and servers that make up the network.

It's the eating a tub of icing for supper of social media features.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Along those lines: it also only shows the sidebar of the first community

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

@[email protected] another interesting idea

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

It suck that they implements karma and collapsing downvoted comments. Two censorship methods

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

The collapsing of downvoted comments is configurable in the user settings, so it's possible to disable it or fine tune it to the way you want it. The discussion is still valid for what the default settings should be

I'm still learning about the karma side, so I don't want to comment on that yet

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Should be the opposite, people who want to collapse comment with lot of downvotes should activate it

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
243 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy.ca's Main Community

3433 readers
15 users here now


Welcome to the lemmy.ca/c/main community!

All new users on lemmy.ca are automatically subscribed to this community, so this is the place to read announcements, make suggestions, and chat about the goings-on of lemmy.ca.

For support requests specific to lemmy.ca, you can use [email protected].


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS