this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
59 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

1189 readers
347 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube has been testing a new way to show you ads that appear when you pause your video, and it feels pretty confident about them.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And with my ad blocker, I will never see them.

If I'm pausing a video it's usually because I need to talk to someone and can't have sound from an ad playing or I need to read something in the video and can't have an ad on top of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

These ads don't have sound. They're just a static ad. You can still see the video, it just gets shrunk and paused.

I mean, they still suck -- but at least understand the thing you're arguing about first.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago

On completely unrelated news the use of adblocks and modded youtube clients have increased by 50%

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

“You can pause here to read the full post”

“No I fucking can’t, an ad for a dubious weight loss product covers it!”

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

That's exactly what I was thinking as well. If I watch a more complex video about maths, programming, engineering or if a primary source is displayed for a second, then I pause the video to have a detailed look AT THE VIDEO, not to look at ads.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What's their definition of "traction" if people literally don't have a choice?

Traction is a marketing buzz word, as though they're trying to say "Our pilot project was a success because x number of people viewed our ads."

But that's completely meaningless because a) they didn't choose to do so, and b) YouTube has no fucking idea if any of those people actually watched the ads or turned elsewhere until they were done.

I hate the modern world. I really do

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Clickthrough rate?

And any study like this is incorrect. Adbockers haven't caught them yet.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Lol ad block the shit outta them

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I pause a video, literally the only thing that is absolutely one hundred percent certain is that I'm not looking at the video. What a stupid idea.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Unless I'm following a tutorial, and pausing to look at the details. On a phone you can pause and pinch-zoom to get a better view.

Would be super annoying if an ad popped up right then.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

I mean if it was instead of ads that inyerupt the actual video I'm all for it.

I suspect it will be as well as the other ads.

Read somewhere today that all these disruptive technologies basically undercut the conventional competition and then slowly become them.

We are full circle back to cable now. A hundred different platforms all trying to gouge you for every penny you can spare.

Next up google gets good traction tattooing brand names on the inside of your eyelids. Or advertising to you whilst you sleep, or go to the toilet.

Still, infinitely prefer that to paying a subscription to a service and still having to endure adverts.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I’ll delete my account