80
“Grok, design her as if she was made by a Rule 34 artist”
(thelemmy.club)
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
I think the left design is boring and drab. Where tf are the colors. But the one on the right is absurd. I would think so even if I wanted a sexy design.
Again we come back to the concept art on the left is still a beautiful woman, but chud incels can't accept anything below "bimbo fetish".
That image has its colors desaturated, in game her top is bright yellow and her hair appears more red. Although maybe that's the aesthetic they'll be going for for the next game, like maybe the whole thing takes place in britain and it's constantly foggy and overcast.
Can't wait to fight King Arthur!
I kinda like the one on the left, reminds me of old D&D and fantasy art. Something about the facial structure and pose is very ancient world in terms of aesthetic.