this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
375 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22063 readers
33 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pro-life, pro-child, pro-family values πŸ‘πŸ€—πŸ’–πŸ’―

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

"There is no such thing as a free lunch", they said :(

To pull more of the article into the comment section:

The Republican Study Committee (of which some three-quarters of House Republicans are members) on Wednesday released its desired 2024 budget, in which the party boldly declares its priority to eliminate the Community Eligibility Provision, or CEP, from the School Lunch Program. Why? Because β€œCEP allows certain schools to provide free school lunches regardless of the individual eligibility of each student.”

Of note is that the CEP is not even something every school participates in; it is a meal service program reserved for qualifying schools and districts in low-income areas. The program enables schools that predominantly serve children from low-income backgrounds to offer all students free breakfast and lunch, instead of means-testing them and having to manage collecting applications on an individual basis. As with many universal-oriented programs, it is more practically efficient and, as a bonus, lifts all boats. This is what Republicans are looking to eliminate.

It’s the kind of provision that many would want every school to participate in. Why not guarantee all our children are well fed as they learn and think about our world and their place in it, after all?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck your kids, billionaires need yet another tax break. -Republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"I love the poorly educated"

They sure do. Dumb people vote for dumb candidates.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I imagine they twirled their mustaches and maniacally laughed while announcing this. How much more cartoonishly villainous can they get?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The one bright side of this article is that it's coming from The New Republic, which is traditionally more conservative. And the author is calling out how sad this plan is.

edit: I'm wrong? This never happens! see reply below.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of all the things to rally people around…

Children should not have to bring money to school to eat. A nutritious and tasty meal should be provided free. Their only worries in school should be whether they studied enough to pass an exam, not on their grumbling stomachs. This is dystopian garbage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's like they say, universal free school meals leads to a lazy population and communism.

Jokes aside, I really don't understand their fear of anything that resembles socialized programs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not American... But I have to say, this sounds just so comically evil it seems something only a badly written cartoon villain would say, like "I will kick all puppies and banish chocolate"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

thinner kids are harder targets /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • cut Social Security and Medicare
  • make Trump’s tax cuts for the top 1 percent permanent
  • impose work requirements on β€œall federal benefit programs,” like food stamps and Medicare
  • extend work requirements on those aged 55–64
  • bring back all of twice-impeached and twice-arrested former President Donald Trump’s deregulations, including the weakening of environmental protection.

Well then

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What happened to states rights? Wasn't that the rationale of getting rid of RoweVWade? Oh yeah, that was another lie. Of course it was.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and this is developed nation XD

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that's a weird priority to have... even weirder to be so proud to announce it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More orphans for the the orphan crushing machine

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The machine needs to be fed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Using public funds to help people? Not on the GOP's watch.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I'm just sad for the US now. Hope you guys will get better times soon.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Can somebody please think off the children!!

Oh wait..

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Republicans ensuring the US will continue wandering the path to a 3rd world country.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, they literally get free lunch. It's some ridiculous stipend over $100 a day. Tax corporations and the 1%, no never. Starving children though, excellent idea. Can't get kick backs from a single parent who's struggling. Plus we can use the money we saved to give Uvalde another armored vehicle. That'll help the children. We are truly screwed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Vote em out! not voting is complacency. Not voting is showing that this is acceptable.

I'm not saying voting is the only action needed, but it is an absolute bear minimum.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

These chucklefucks always seem to choose the more expensive way of going about it in the name of saving taxpayers money. Abject morons.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί