this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
111 points (100.0% liked)

Science

3172 readers
1 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Powered a single microchip for six months with the chip just burning cycles for 45 minutes on and 15 minutes off. Further details not provided in article. Probably in the paper if you wanna read that.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Buried all the way down in the abstract, damn. Glad I didn’t go seeking this info myself, would have wasted a lot of time reading that paragraph.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I tried a quick google to see how much it uses but I guess it depends on peripherals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

No details on what the processor is even doing, only that they technically consider it a "computer"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

... and light. This is a solar panel. Cool, but not really ground breaking as the article suggests.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With embedded battery, where neither depend on mined metals, both are biodegradable and non toxic, and it's carbon fixing (negative greenhouse gas impact). Yeah that's fucking groundbreaking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You don't need a battery, just a capacitor for these levels of power draw, and you would be hard pressed to find a material that is more abundant on earth then silicon.