this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
475 points (94.1% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5310 readers
1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, probably not. But the point remains that the government can be very disorganized, underfunded, and just generally bad at running facilities. If we hand out food production off to the government then we need to take extreme measures to ensure they have adequate funding, competent leadership, and are well insulated from corruption.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the point remains that the government can be very disorganized, underfunded, and just generally bad at running facilities.

The underfunding generally causes the other problems you already listed.

Again, what are you proposing? The status quo which is destroying the planet? More privatization?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not proposing anything. I literally said "idk man". I'm just pointing out that "give it to the government" isn't a one and done solution.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not proposing anything.

That's a bit of a lie because you keep saying "government bad" and with nothing else said that implies that the status quo that is failing life on Earth is acceptable to you, right now.

I'm just pointing out that "give it to the government" isn't a one and done solution.

And if you're proposing nothing else but "government bad" then you're supporting the status quo, again, by implication.