view the rest of the comments
Political Discussion and Commentary
A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!
The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.
Content Rules:
- Self posts preferred.
- Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
- No spam or self promotion.
- Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.
Commentary Rules
- Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
- Stay on topic.
- Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
- Provide credible sources whenever possible.
- Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
- Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
- Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).
Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.
Partnered Communities:
• Politics
• Science
I’ve been contemplating this terrible Truman Show that we’re living in and finding it ironic that Iran, this bogeyman for decades, has a chance to be the entity that finally tells the guy no and makes it stick. It’s a really interesting twist from the writers’ room. But the likelihood of that chance working out depends a lot on how far the US-Israeli war crimes go, and this story is bad news on that front.
Since the military is completely spineless and won’t give a damn about the constitution he will tamp this up to the point of using tactical nukes on Iran.
He only has two goals: distract from the epstein files and make sure his power isn’t curbed domestically.
But even with nukes, Iran won’t give up. They are defending their own existence.
I.e. to Mango Iran is just a means to an end, but to Iran this war is about the survival of the Persian peoples.
Iran has the most passive power of all nations in the Middle East. They are literally capable of forging alliances that we’re not possible prior to this war. This might help cause China to emerge as the new world power to replace the US.
Hey would you look at that. We are discussing this
The mid- and low- ranks are taught that their duty is to follow orders above all else. Even with some instruction about war crimes, they’ve still been told that theirs is not to reason why (or make reply), theirs is but to do and die. I wouldn’t call it spinelessness, but I take your point.
The high-level officers are supposed to know better than to order the wrong things, and I have to applaud Randy George for his refusal. Getting fired publicly is presumably the best warning he feels he can provide. But they’ll dig around and find someone more compliant, then proceed.
The article has been updated since I originally posted it, with new developments:
So there it is. Anyone with a “meteoric rise” under this administration is a loyalist and will do what the last three before him refused.
I’ve already heard talk of the emergence of the petroyuan. If the petrodollar collapses, so will US hegemony. Existential threats abound for many.
The upside is that the zionist yankee empire is collapsing. The downside is most of us are (a reluctant) part of that empire.